ClassUtil {psychometric} | R Documentation |
Classical Utility of a Test
Description
Calculate the classical utility of a test given a correlation, base-rate and selection ratio.
Usage
ClassUtil(rxy = 0, BR = 0.5, SR = 0.5)
Arguments
rxy |
Correlation of Test X with Outcome Y |
BR |
Base Rate or prevalence without use of a test |
SR |
Selection Ratio: Number selected out of those tested |
Details
The degree of utility of using a test as a selection instrument over randomly selecting individuals can be reflected in the decision outcomes expected by using the selection instrument. Suppose you have a predictor (selection instrument) and a criterion (job performance). By regressing the criterion on the predictor, and selecting individuals based on some cut-off value, we have 4 possible outcomes. A = True Positives, B = True Negatives, C = False Negatives, and D = False Positives. The classical utility of using the test over current procedures (random selection) is:
[A / (A+D)] - [(A + C) / (A + B + C + D)]
Various manipulations of these relationships can be used to assist in decision making.
Value
Returns a table with the following elements reflecting decision outcomes:
True Positives |
Probability of correctly selecting a successful candidate |
False Negatives |
Probability of incorrectly not selecting a successful candidate |
False Positives |
Probability of incorrectly selecting an unsuccessful candidate |
True Negatives |
Probability of correctly not selecting an unsuccessful candidate |
Sensitivity |
True Positives / (True Positives + False Negatives) |
Specificity |
True Negatives / (True Negatives + False Positives) |
% of Decisions Correct |
Percentage of correct decisions |
Proportion Selected Succesful |
Proportion of those selected expected to be successful |
% Improvement over BR |
Percentage of improvement using the test over random selection |
Author(s)
Thomas D. Fletcher t.d.fletcher05@gmail.com
References
Murphy, K. R. & Davidshofer, C. O. (2005). Psychological testing: Principles and applications (5th ed.). Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
See Also
Examples
# 50 percent of those randomly selected are expected to be successful
# A company need only select 1/10 applicants
# The correlation between test scores and performance is .35
ClassUtil(.35, .5, .1)