truePrevMulti2 {prevalence} | R Documentation |
Estimate true prevalence from individuals samples using multiple tests – covariance scheme
Description
Bayesian estimation of true prevalence from apparent prevalence obtained by applying multiple tests to individual samples. truePrevMulti2
implements and extends the approach described by Dendukuri and Joseph (2001), which uses a multinomial distribution to model observed test results,
and in which conditional dependence between tests is modelled through
covariances.
Usage
truePrevMulti2(x, n, prior, nchains = 2, burnin = 10000, update = 10000,
verbose = FALSE)
Arguments
x |
Vector of apparent test results; see 'Details' below |
n |
The total sample size |
prior |
The prior distributions; see 'Details' below |
nchains |
The number of chains used in the estimation process; must be |
burnin |
The number of discarded model iterations; defaults to 10,000 |
update |
The number of withheld model iterations; defaults to 10,000 |
verbose |
Logical flag, indicating if JAGS process output should be printed to the R console; defaults to |
Details
truePrevMulti2
calls on JAGS via the rjags package to estimate true prevalence from apparent prevalence in a Bayesian framework. truePrevMulti2
fits a multinomial model to the apparent test results obtained by testing individual samples with a given number of tests. To see the actual fitted model, see the model slot of the prev
-object.
The vector of apparent tests results, x
, must contain the number of samples corresponding to each combination of test results. To see how this vector is defined for the number of tests h
at hand, use define_x
.
Argument prior
consists of prior distributions for:
True Prevalence:
TP
SEnsitivity of each individual test: vector
SE
SPecificity of each individual test: vector
SP
Conditional covariance of all possible test combinations given a truly positive disease status: vector
a
Conditional covariance of all possible test combinations given a truly negative disease status: vector
b
To see how prior
is defined for the number of tests h
at hand, use define_prior2
.
The values of prior
can be specified in two ways, referred to as BUGS-style and list-style, respectively. See also below for some examples.
For BUGS-style specification, the values of prior
should be given between curly brackets (i.e., {}
), separated by line breaks. Priors can be specified to be deterministic (i.e., fixed), using the <-
operator, or stochastic, using the ~
operator. In the latter case, the following distributions can be used:
Uniform:
dunif(min, max)
Beta:
dbeta(alpha, beta)
Beta-PERT:
dpert(min, mode, max)
Alternatively, priors can be specified in a named list()
as follows:
Fixed:
list(dist = "fixed", par)
Uniform:
list(dist = "uniform", min, max)
Beta:
list(dist = "beta", alpha, beta)
Beta-PERT:
list(dist = "pert", method, a, m, b, k)
'method'
must be"classic"
or"vose"
;
'a'
denotes the pessimistic (minimum) estimate,'m'
the most likely estimate, and'b'
the optimistic (maximum) estimate;
'k'
denotes the scale parameter.
SeebetaPERT
for more information on Beta-PERT parameterization.Beta-Expert:
list(dist = "beta-expert", mode, mean, lower, upper, p)
'mode'
denotes the most likely estimate,'mean'
the mean estimate;
'lower'
denotes the lower bound,'upper'
the upper bound;
'p'
denotes the confidence level of the expert.
Onlymode
ormean
should be specified;lower
andupper
can be specified together or alone.
SeebetaExpert
for more information on Beta-Expert parameterization.
Value
An object of class prev
.
Note
Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling in truePrevMulti2
is performed by JAGS (Just Another Gibbs Sampler) through the rjags package. JAGS can be downloaded from https://mcmc-jags.sourceforge.io/.
Author(s)
Brecht Devleesschauwer <brechtdv@gmail.com>
References
Dendukuri N, Joseph L (2001) Bayesian approaches to modeling the conditional dependence between multiple diagnostic tests. Biometrics 57:158-167
See Also
define_x
: how to define the vector of apparent test results x
define_prior2
: how to define prior
coda for various functions that can be applied to the prev@mcmc
object
truePrevMulti
: estimate true prevalence from apparent prevalence obtained by testing individual samples with multiple tests, using a conditional probability scheme
truePrev
: estimate true prevalence from apparent prevalence obtained by testing individual samples with a single test
truePrevPools
: estimate true prevalence from apparent prevalence obtained by testing pooled samples
betaPERT
: calculate the parameters of a Beta-PERT distribution
betaExpert
: calculate the parameters of a Beta distribution based on expert opinion
Examples
## Not run:
## ===================================================== ##
## 2-TEST EXAMPLE: Strongyloides ##
## ----------------------------------------------------- ##
## Two tests were performed on 162 humans ##
## -> T1 = stool examination ##
## -> T2 = serology test ##
## Expert opinion generated the following priors: ##
## -> SE1 ~ dbeta( 4.44, 13.31) ##
## -> SP1 ~ dbeta(71.25, 3.75) ##
## -> SE2 ~ dbeta(21.96, 5.49) ##
## -> SP2 ~ dbeta( 4.10, 1.76) ##
## The following results were obtained: ##
## -> 38 samples T1+,T2+ ##
## -> 2 samples T1+,T2- ##
## -> 87 samples T1-,T2+ ##
## -> 35 samples T1-,T2- ##
## ===================================================== ##
## how is the 2-test model defined?
define_x(2)
define_prior2(2)
## fit Strongyloides 2-test model
## a first model assumes conditional independence
## -> set covariance terms to zero
strongy_indep <-
truePrevMulti2(
x = c(38, 2, 87, 35),
n = 162,
prior = {
TP ~ dbeta(1, 1)
SE[1] ~ dbeta( 4.44, 13.31)
SP[1] ~ dbeta(71.25, 3.75)
SE[2] ~ dbeta(21.96, 5.49)
SP[2] ~ dbeta( 4.10, 1.76)
a[1] <- 0
b[1] <- 0
})
## show model results
strongy_indep
## fit same model using 'list-style'
strongy_indep <-
truePrevMulti2(
x = c(38, 2, 87, 35),
n = 162,
prior =
list(
TP = list(dist = "beta", alpha = 1, beta = 1),
SE1 = list(dist = "beta", alpha = 4.44, beta = 13.31),
SP1 = list(dist = "beta", alpha = 71.25, beta = 3.75),
SE2 = list(dist = "beta", alpha = 21.96, beta = 5.49),
SP2 = list(dist = "beta", alpha = 4.10, beta = 1.76),
a1 = 0,
b1 = 0
)
)
## show model results
strongy_indep
## fit Strongyloides 2-test model
## a second model allows for conditional dependence
## -> a[1] is the covariance between T1 and T2, given D+
## -> b[1] is the covariance between T1 and T2, given D-
## -> a[1] and b[1] can range between +/- 2^-h, ie, (-.25, .25)
strongy <-
truePrevMulti2(
x = c(38, 2, 87, 35),
n = 162,
prior = {
TP ~ dbeta(1, 1)
SE[1] ~ dbeta( 4.44, 13.31)
SP[1] ~ dbeta(71.25, 3.75)
SE[2] ~ dbeta(21.96, 5.49)
SP[2] ~ dbeta( 4.10, 1.76)
a[1] ~ dunif(-0.25, 0.25)
b[1] ~ dunif(-0.25, 0.25)
})
## explore model structure
str(strongy) # overall structure
str(strongy@par) # structure of slot 'par'
str(strongy@mcmc) # structure of slot 'mcmc'
strongy@model # fitted model
strongy@diagnostics # DIC, BGR and Bayes-P values
## standard methods
print(strongy)
summary(strongy)
par(mfrow = c(2, 2))
plot(strongy) # shows plots of TP by default
plot(strongy, "SE[1]") # same plots for SE1
plot(strongy, "SE[2]") # same plots for SE2
plot(strongy, "SP[1]") # same plots for SP1
plot(strongy, "SP[2]") # same plots for SP2
plot(strongy, "a[1]") # same plots for a[1]
plot(strongy, "b[1]") # same plots for b[1]
## coda plots of all parameters
par(mfrow = c(2, 4)); densplot(strongy, col = "red")
par(mfrow = c(2, 4)); traceplot(strongy)
par(mfrow = c(2, 4)); gelman.plot(strongy)
par(mfrow = c(2, 4)); autocorr.plot(strongy)
## End(Not run)