summ.lm {jtools} | R Documentation |
Linear regression summaries with options
Description
summ()
prints output for a regression model in a fashion similar to
summary()
, but formatted differently with more options.
Usage
## S3 method for class 'lm'
summ(
model,
scale = FALSE,
confint = getOption("summ-confint", FALSE),
ci.width = getOption("summ-ci.width", 0.95),
robust = getOption("summ-robust", FALSE),
cluster = NULL,
vifs = getOption("summ-vifs", FALSE),
digits = getOption("jtools-digits", 2),
pvals = getOption("summ-pvals", TRUE),
n.sd = 1,
center = FALSE,
transform.response = FALSE,
scale.only = FALSE,
data = NULL,
part.corr = FALSE,
model.info = getOption("summ-model.info", TRUE),
model.fit = getOption("summ-model.fit", TRUE),
model.coefs = getOption("summ-model.coefs", TRUE),
which.cols = NULL,
vcov = NULL,
...
)
Arguments
model |
A |
scale |
If |
confint |
Show confidence intervals instead of standard errors? Default
is |
ci.width |
A number between 0 and 1 that signifies the width of the
desired confidence interval. Default is |
robust |
If not Default is This requires the |
cluster |
For clustered standard errors, provide the column name of
the cluster variable in the input data frame (as a string). Alternately,
provide a vector of clusters. Note that you must set |
vifs |
If |
digits |
An integer specifying the number of digits past the decimal to
report in the output. Default is 2. You can change the default number of
digits for all jtools functions with
|
pvals |
Show p values? If |
n.sd |
If |
center |
If you want coefficients for mean-centered variables but don't
want to standardize, set this to |
transform.response |
Should scaling/centering apply to response
variable? Default is |
scale.only |
If you want to scale but not center, set this to |
data |
If you provide the data used to fit the model here, that data
frame is used to re-fit the model (if |
part.corr |
Print partial (labeled "partial.r") and
semipartial (labeled "part.r") correlations with the table?
Default is |
model.info |
Toggles printing of basic information on sample size, name of DV, and number of predictors. |
model.fit |
Toggles printing of model fit statistics. |
model.coefs |
Toggles printing of model coefficents. |
which.cols |
Developmental feature. By providing columns by name, you can add/remove/reorder requested columns in the output. Not fully supported, for now. |
vcov |
You may provide your own variance-covariance matrix for the
regression coefficients if you want to calculate standard errors in
some way not accommodated by the |
... |
Among other things, arguments are passed to |
Details
By default, this function will print the following items to the console:
The sample size
The name of the outcome variable
The R-squared value plus adjusted R-squared
A table with regression coefficients, standard errors, t-values, and p values.
There are several options available for robust
. The heavy
lifting is done by sandwich::vcovHC()
, where those are better
described.
Put simply, you may choose from "HC0"
to "HC5"
. Based on the
recommendation of the developers of sandwich, the default is set to
"HC3"
. Stata's default is "HC1"
, so that choice may be better
if the goal is to replicate Stata's output. Any option that is understood
by vcovHC()
will be accepted. Cluster-robust standard errors are
computed if cluster
is set to the name of the input data's cluster
variable or is a vector of clusters.
The scale
and center
options are performed via
refitting
the model with scale_mod()
and center_mod()
,
respectively. Each of those in turn uses gscale()
for the
mean-centering and scaling.
If using part.corr = TRUE
, then you will get these two common
effect size metrics on the far right two columns of the output table.
However, it should be noted that these do not go hand in hand with
robust standard error estimators. The standard error of the coefficient
doesn't change the point estimate, just the uncertainty. However,
this function uses t-statistics in its calculation of the
partial and semipartial correlation. This provides what amounts to a
heteroskedasticity-adjusted set of estimates, but I am unaware of any
statistical publication that validates this type of use. Please
use these as a heuristic when used alongside robust standard errors; do
not report the "robust" partial and semipartial correlations in
publications.
Value
If saved, users can access most of the items that are returned in the output (and without rounding).
coeftable |
The outputted table of variables and coefficients |
model |
The model for which statistics are displayed. This would be
most useful in cases in which |
Much other information can be accessed as attributes.
Author(s)
Jacob Long jacob.long@sc.edu
References
King, G., & Roberts, M. E. (2015). How robust standard errors expose methodological problems they do not fix, and what to do about it. Political Analysis, 23(2), 159–179. doi:10.1093/pan/mpu015
Lumley, T., Diehr, P., Emerson, S., & Chen, L. (2002). The Importance of the Normality Assumption in Large Public Health Data Sets. Annual Review of Public Health, 23, 151–169. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.100901.140546
See Also
scale_mod()
can simply perform the standardization if
preferred.
gscale()
does the heavy lifting for mean-centering and scaling
behind the scenes.
Other summ:
summ.glm()
,
summ.merMod()
,
summ.rq()
,
summ.svyglm()
Examples
# Create lm object
fit <- lm(Income ~ Frost + Illiteracy + Murder,
data = as.data.frame(state.x77))
# Print the output with standardized coefficients and 3 digits
summ(fit, scale = TRUE, digits = 3)