dsm_var_movblk {dsm} | R Documentation |
Variance estimation via parametric moving block bootstrap
Description
Estimate the variance in abundance over an area using a moving block bootstrap. Two procedures are implemented, one incorporating detection function uncertainty, one not.
Usage
dsm_var_movblk(
dsm.object,
pred.data,
n.boot,
block.size,
off.set,
ds.uncertainty = FALSE,
samp.unit.name = "Transect.Label",
progress.file = NULL,
bs.file = NULL,
bar = TRUE
)
Arguments
dsm.object |
object returned from |
pred.data |
either: a single prediction grid or list of prediction
grids. Each grid should be a |
n.boot |
number of bootstrap resamples. |
block.size |
number of segments in each block. |
off.set |
a a vector or list of vectors with as many elements as there
are in |
ds.uncertainty |
incorporate uncertainty in the detection function? See Details, below. Note that this feature is EXPERIMENTAL at the moment. |
samp.unit.name |
name sampling unit to resample (default 'Transect.Label'). |
progress.file |
path to a file to be used (usually by Distance) to
generate a progress bar (default |
bs.file |
path to a file to store each bootstrap round. This stores all
of the bootstrap results rather than just the summaries, enabling
outliers to be detected and removed. (Default |
bar |
should a progress bar be printed to screen? (Default |
Details
Setting ds.uncertainty=TRUE
will incorporate detection function
uncertainty directly into the bootstrap. This is done by generating
observations from the fitted detection function and then re-fitting a new
detection function (of the same form), then calculating a new effective
strip width. Rejection sampling is used to generate the observations
(except in the half-normal case) so the procedure can be rather slow. Note
that this is currently not supported with covariates in the detection
function.
Setting ds.uncertainty=FALSE
will incorporate detection function
uncertainty using the delta method. This assumes that the detection
function and the spatial model are INDEPENDENT. This is probably not
reasonable.
Examples
## Not run:
library(Distance)
library(dsm)
# load the Gulf of Mexico dolphin data (see ?mexdolphins)
data(mexdolphins)
# fit a detection function and look at the summary
hr.model <- ds(distdata, truncation=6000,
key = "hr", adjustment = NULL)
summary(hr.model)
# fit a simple smooth of x and y
mod1 <- dsm(count~s(x, y), hr.model, segdata, obsdata)
summary(mod1)
# calculate the variance by 500 moving block bootstraps
mod1.movblk <- dsm_var_movblk(mod1, preddata, n.boot = 500,
block.size = 3, samp.unit.name = "Transect.Label",
off.set = preddata$area,
bar = TRUE, bs.file = "mexico-bs.csv", ds.uncertainty = TRUE)
## End(Not run)