calibrateDepth {diveMove} | R Documentation |
Calibrate Depth and Generate a "TDRcalibrate" object
Description
Detect periods of major activities in a TDR record, calibrate
depth readings, and generate a TDRcalibrate
object
essential for subsequent summaries of diving behaviour.
Usage
calibrateDepth(
x,
dry.thr = 70,
wet.cond,
wet.thr = 3610,
dive.thr = 4,
zoc.method = c("visual", "offset", "filter"),
...,
interp.wet = FALSE,
dive.model = c("unimodal", "smooth.spline"),
smooth.par = 0.1,
knot.factor = 3,
descent.crit.q = 0,
ascent.crit.q = 0
)
Arguments
x |
An object of class |
dry.thr |
numeric: dry error threshold in seconds. Dry phases shorter than this threshold will be considered as wet. |
wet.cond |
logical: indicates which observations should be considered wet. If it is not provided, records with non-missing depth are assumed to correspond to wet conditions (see ‘Details’ and ‘Note’ below). |
wet.thr |
numeric: wet threshold in seconds. At-sea phases shorter than this threshold will be considered as trivial wet. |
dive.thr |
numeric: threshold depth below which an underwater phase should be considered a dive. |
zoc.method |
character string to indicate the method to use for zero offset correction. One of “visual”, “offset”, or “filter” (see ‘Details’). |
... |
Arguments required for ZOC methods |
interp.wet |
logical: if TRUE (default is FALSE), then an interpolating spline function is used to impute NA depths in wet periods (after ZOC). Use with caution: it may only be useful in cases where the missing data pattern in wet periods is restricted to shallow depths near the beginning and end of dives. This pattern is common in some satellite-linked TDRs. |
dive.model |
character string specifying what model to use for each dive for the purpose of dive phase identification. One of “smooth.spline” or “unimodal”, to choose among smoothing spline or unimodal regression (see ‘Details’). For dives with less than five observations, smoothing spline regression is used regardless (see ‘Details’). |
smooth.par |
numeric scalar representing amount of smoothing
(argument |
knot.factor |
numeric scalar that multiplies the number of samples in the dive. This is used to construct the time predictor for the derivative. |
descent.crit.q |
numeric: critical quantile of rates of descent below which descent is deemed to have ended. |
ascent.crit.q |
numeric: critical quantile of rates of ascent above which ascent is deemed to have started. |
Details
This function is really a wrapper around .detPhase
,
.detDive
, and .zoc
which perform the work on simplified
objects. It performs wet/dry phase detection, zero-offset correction
of depth, and detection of dives, as well as proper labelling of the
latter.
The procedure starts by zero-offset correcting depth (see ‘ZOC’
below), and then a factor is created with value “L” (dry) for
rows with NAs for depth
and value “W” (wet) otherwise.
This assumes that TDRs were programmed to turn off recording
of depth when instrument is dry (typically by means of a salt-water
switch). If this assumption cannot be made for any reason, then a
logical vector as long as the time series should be supplied as
argument wet.cond
to indicate which observations should be
considered wet. This argument is directly analogous to the
subset
argument in subset.data.frame
, so it can
refer to any variable in the TDR
object (see
‘Note’ section below). The duration of each of these phases of
activity is subsequently calculated. If the duration of a dry phase
(“L”) is less than dry.thr
, then the values in the factor
for that phase are changed to “W” (wet). The duration of phases
is then recalculated, and if the duration of a phase of wet activity is
less than wet.thr
, then the corresponding value for the factor
is changed to “Z” (trivial wet). The durations of all phases
are recalculated a third time to provide final phase durations.
Some instruments produce a peculiar pattern of missing data near the
surface, at the beginning and/or end of dives. The argument
interp.wet
may help to rectify this problem by using an
interpolating spline function to impute the missing data, constraining
the result to a minimum depth of zero. Please note that this optional
step is performed after ZOC and before identifying dives, so that
interpolation is performed through dry phases coded as wet because
their duration was briefer than dry.thr
. Therefore,
dry.thr
must be chosen carefully to avoid interpolation through
legitimate dry periods.
The next step is to detect dives whenever the zero-offset corrected depth in an underwater phase is below the specified dive threshold. A new factor with finer levels of activity is thus generated, including “U” (underwater), and “D” (diving) in addition to the ones described above.
Once dives have been detected and assigned to a period of wet activity, phases within dives are identified using the descent, ascent and wiggle criteria (see ‘Detection of dive phases’ below). This procedure generates a factor with levels “D”, “DB”, “B”, “BA”, “DA”, “A”, and “X”, breaking the input into descent, descent/bottom, bottom, bottom/ascent, ascent, descent/ascent (ocurring when no bottom phase can be detected) and non-dive (surface), respectively.
## ZOC
This procedure is required to correct drifts in the pressure transducer of TDR records and noise in depth measurements. Three methods are available to perform this correction.
Method “visual” calls plotTDR
, which plots depth
and, optionally, speed vs. time with the ability of zooming in and out
on time, changing maximum depths displayed, and panning through time.
The button to zero-offset correct sections of the record allows for the
collection of ‘x’ and ‘y’ coordinates for two points,
obtained by clicking on the plot region. The first point clicked
represents the offset and beginning time of section to correct, and the
second one represents the ending time of the section to correct.
Multiple sections of the record can be corrected in this manner, by
panning through the time and repeating the procedure. In case there's
overlap between zero offset corrected windows, the last one prevails.
Method “offset” can be used when the offset is known in advance, and this value is used to correct the entire time series. Therefore, offset=0 specifies no correction.
Method “filter” implements a smoothing/filtering mechanism where
running quantiles can be applied to depth measurements in a recursive
manner (Luque and Fried 2011), using .depth.filter
. The method
calculates the first running quantile defined by probs[1]
on a
moving window of size k[1]
. The next running quantile, defined
by probs[2]
and k[2]
, is applied to the smoothed/filtered
depth measurements from the previous step, and so on. The corrected
depth measurements (d) are calculated as:
d=d_{0} - d_{n}
where d_{0}
is original depth and d_{n}
is the
last smoothed/filtered depth. This method is under development, but
reasonable results can be achieved by applying two filters (see
‘Examples’). The default na.rm=TRUE
works well when
there are no level shifts between non-NA phases in the data, but
na.rm=FALSE
is better in the presence of such shifts. In other
words, there is no reason to pollute the moving window with NAs when
non-NA phases can be regarded as a continuum, so splicing non-NA phases
makes sense. Conversely, if there are level shifts between non-NA
phases, then it is better to retain NA phases to help the algorithm
recognize the shifts while sliding the window(s). The search for the
surface can be limited to specified bounds during smoothing/filtering,
so that observations outside these bounds are interpolated using the
bounded smoothed/filtered series.
Once the whole record has been zero-offset corrected, remaining depths below zero, are set to zero, as these are assumed to indicate values at the surface.
## Detection of dive phases
The process for each dive begins by taking all observations below the dive detection threshold, and setting the beginning and end depths to zero, at time steps prior to the first and after the last, respectively. The latter ensures that descent and ascent derivatives are non-negative and non-positive, respectively, so that the end and beginning of these phases are not truncated. The next step is to fit a model to each dive. Two models can be chosen for this purpose: ‘unimodal’ (default) and ‘smooth.spline’.
Both models consist of a cubic spline, and its first derivative is evaluated to investigate changes in vertical rate. Therefore, at least 4 observations are required for each dive, so the time series is linearly interpolated at equally spaced time steps if this limit is not achieved in the current dive. Wiggles at the beginning and end of the dive are assumed to be zero offset correction errors, so depth observations at these extremes are interpolated between zero and the next observations when this occurs.
### ‘unimodal’
In this default model, the spline is constrained to be unimodal
(Koellmann et al. 2014), assuming the diver must return to the surface
to breathe. The model is fitted using the uniReg package (see
unireg
). This model and constraint are
consistent with the definition of dives in air-breathers, so is
certainly appropriate for this group of divers. A major advantage of
this approach over the next one is that the degree of smoothing is
determined via restricted maximum likelihood, and has no influence on
identifying the transition between descent and ascent. Therefore,
unimodal regression splines make the latter transition clearer compared
to using smoothing splines.
However, note that dives with less than five samples are fit using smoothing splines (see section below) regardless, as they produce the same fit as unimodal regression but much faster. Therefore, ensure that the parameters for that model are appropriate for the data, although defaults are reasonable.
### ‘smooth.spline’
In this model, specified via dive.model="smooth.spline"
, a
smoothing spline is used to model each dive (see
smooth.spline
), using the chosen smoothing parameter.
Dive phases identified via this model, however, are highly sensitive to
the degree of smoothing (smooth.par
) used, thus making it
difficult to determine what amount of smoothing is adequate.
A comparison of these methods is shown in the Examples section of
diveModel
.
The first derivate of the spline is evaluated at a set of knots to
calculate the vertical rate throughout the dive and determine the end
of descent and beginning of ascent. This set of knots is established
using a regular time sequence with beginning and end equal to the
extremes of the input sequence, and with length equal to N \times
knot.factor
. Equivalent procedures are used
for detecting descent and ascent phases.
Once one of the models above has been fitted to each dive, the quantile
corresponding to (descent.crit.q
) of all the positive
derivatives (rate of descent) at the beginning of the dive is used as
threshold for determining the end of descent. Descent is deemed to
have ended at the first minimum derivative, and the nearest
input time observation is considered to indicate the end of descent.
The sign of the comparisons is reversed for detecting the ascent. If
observed depth to the left and right of the derivative defining the
ascent are the same, the right takes precedence.
The particular dive phase categories are subsequently defined using simple set operations.
Value
An object of class TDRcalibrate
.
Note
Note that the condition implied with argument wet.cond
is
evaluated after the ZOC procedure, so it can refer to corrected
depth. In many cases, not all variables in the TDR
object are sampled with the same frequency, so they may need to be
interpolated before using them for this purpose. Note also that
any of these variables may contain similar problems as those dealth
with during ZOC, so programming instruments to record depth only
when wet is likely the best way to ensure proper detection of
wet/dry conditions.
Author(s)
Sebastian P. Luque spluque@gmail.com
References
Koellmann, C., Ickstadt, K. and Fried, R. (2014) Beyond unimodal regression: modelling multimodality with piecewise unimodal, mixture or additive regression. Technical Report 8. https://sfb876.tu-dortmund.de/FORSCHUNG/techreports.html, SFB 876, TU Dortmund
Luque, S.P. and Fried, R. (2011) Recursive filtering for zero offset correction of diving depth time series. PLoS ONE 6:e15850
See Also
TDRcalibrate
, .zoc
,
.depthFilter
, .detPhase
,
.detDive
, plotTDR
, and
plotZOC
to visually assess ZOC procedure. See
diveModel
, smooth.spline
,
unireg
for dive models.
Examples
data(divesTDR)
divesTDR
## Too long for checks
## Consider a 3 m offset, a dive threshold of 3 m, the 1% quantile for
## critical vertical rates, and a set of knots 20 times as long as the
## observed time steps. Default smoothing spline model for dive phase
## detection, using default smoothing parameter.
(dcalib <- calibrateDepth(divesTDR, dive.thr=3, zoc.method="offset",
offset=3, descent.crit.q=0.01, ascent.crit.q=0,
knot.factor=20))
## Or ZOC algorithmically with method="filter":
## dcalib <- calibrateDepth(divesTDR, dive.thr=3, zoc.method="filter",
## k=c(3, 5760), probs=c(0.5, 0.02), na.rm=TRUE,
## descent.crit.q=0.01, ascent.crit.q=0,
## knot.factor=20))
## If no ZOC required:
data(divesTDRzoc)
(dcalib <- calibrateDepth(divesTDRzoc, dive.thr=3, zoc.method="offset",
offset=0, descent.crit.q=0.01, ascent.crit.q=0,
knot.factor=20))