| nfc_cat {catSurv} | R Documentation |
Need for Cognition Cat Object
Description
Cat object containing item parameters for graded response model fit with responses to the 34 item Need for Cognition inventory
Usage
data(nfc_cat)
Format
An object of class Cat of length 1.
Details
Cat object containing item parameters for graded response model fit with 4985 response profiles collected by Qualtrics in June 2018 and 1512 response profiles from The American Panel Survey (TAPS) in December 2014. TAPS is a monthly online panel survey of about 2,000 adults in the United States. The panel was recruited in the fall of 2011 using an address-based sampling frame. TAPS surveys are administered online. Selected panelists who do not have a computer or online service are provided a computer and internet access by TAPS.
See Cat-class for details regarding the Cat object structure.
See grmCat for details regarding the graded response model.
A normal prior was chosen with mean from the theta estimates from the TAPS sample (.003) and a standard deviation (1.6) wide enough to envelope the range of estimated theta values across both samples.
Note that due to how the item parameters were estimated, large, positive values indicate "more" of the latent trait.
Response options are:
5 = Strongly agree, 4 = Somewhat agree, 3 = Neither agree nor disagree, 2 = Somewhat disagree, 1 = Strongly disagree
The wording of the question items is:
q1I would prefer complex to simple problems.
q2I don't like to have the responsibility for handling a situation that requires a lot of thinking.
q3Thinking is not my idea of fun.
q4I would rather do something that requires little thought than something that is sure to challenge my thinking abilities.
q5I try to anticipate and avoid situations where there is a likely chance I will have to think in depth about something.
q6I find little satisfaction in deliberating hard and for long hours.
q7I only think as hard as I have to.
q8I prefer to think about small, daily projects more than long-term ones.
q9I like tasks that require little thought once I've learned them.
q10The idea of relying on thought to make my way to the top does not appeal to me.
q11I really enjoy a task that involves coming up with new solutions to problems.
q12Learning new ways to think doesn't excite me very much.
q13I prefer my life to be filled with puzzles that I must solve.
q14The notion of thinking abstractly is not appealing to me.
q15I would prefer a task that is intellectual, difficult, and important to one that is somewhat important but does not require much thought.
q16I feel relief rather the satisfaction after completing a task that required a lot of mental effort.
q17Its enough for me that something gets the job done, I don't care how or why it works.
q18I usually end up deliberating about issues even when they do not affect me personally.
q19I tend to set goals that can be accomplished only by expending considerable mental effort.
q20I am usually tempted to put more thought into a task than the job minimally requires.
q21I am hesitant about making important decisions after thinking about them.
q22I prefer just to let things happen rather than try to understand why they turned out that way.
q23I have difficulty thinking in new and unfamiliar situations.
q24I am an intellectual.
q25I don't reason well under pressure.
q26I more often talk with other people about the reasons/possible solutions to international problems than about gossip or tidbits about what famous people are doing.
q27These days, I see little chance for performing well, even in intellectual jobs, unless one knows the right people.
q28More often than not, more thinking just leads to more errors.
q29I appreciate opportunities to discover the strengths and weaknesses of my own reasoning.
q30I prefer watching educational programs more than entertainment programs.
q31I think best when those around me are very intelligent.
q32Simply knowing the answer rather than understanding the reasons for the answer to a problem is fine with me.
q33Ignorance is bliss.
q34I enjoy thinking about an issue even when the results of my thought will have no effect on the outcome of the issue.
Source
See https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/pdsl for the raw YouGov and/or Qualtrics data.
See https://wc.wustl.edu/american-panel-survey for raw TAPS data.
References
Cacioppo, John T., and Richard E. Petty. "The need for cognition." Journal of personality and social psychology 42.1 (1982): 116.