metahet {altmeta} | R Documentation |
Meta-Analysis Heterogeneity Measures
Description
Calculates various between-study heterogeneity measures in meta-analysis, including the conventional measures (e.g., I^2
) and the alternative measures (e.g., I_r^2
) which are robust to outlying studies; p-values of various tests are also calculated.
Usage
metahet(y, s2, data, n.resam = 1000)
Arguments
y |
a numeric vector specifying the observed effect sizes in the collected studies; they are assumed to be normally distributed. |
s2 |
a numeric vector specifying the within-study variances. |
data |
an optional data frame containing the meta-analysis dataset. If |
n.resam |
a positive integer specifying the number of resampling iterations for calculating p-values of test statistics and 95% confidence interval of heterogeneity measures. |
Details
Suppose that a meta-analysis collects n
studies. The observed effect size in study i
is y_i
and its within-study variance is s^{2}_{i}
. Also, the inverse-variance weight is w_i = 1 / s^{2}_{i}
. The fixed-effect estimate of overall effect size is \bar{\mu} = \sum_{i = 1}^{n} w_i y_i / \sum_{i = 1}^{n} w_i
. The conventional test statistic for heterogeneity is
Q = \sum_{i = 1}^{n} w_i (y_{i} - \bar{\mu})^2.
Based on the Q
statistic, the method-of-moments estimate of the between-study variance \hat{\tau}_{DL}^2
is (DerSimonian and Laird, 1986)
\hat{\tau}^2_{DL} = \max \left\{ 0, \frac{Q - (n - 1)}{\sum_{i = 1}^{n} w_{i} - \sum_{i = 1}^{n} w_{i}^{2} / \sum_{i = 1}^{n} w_{i}} \right\}.
Also, the H
and I^2
statistics (Higgins and Thompson, 2002; Higgins et al., 2003) are widely used in practice because they do not depend on the number of collected studies n
and the effect size scale; these two statistics are defined as
H = \sqrt{Q/(n - 1)};
I^{2} = \frac{Q - (n - 1)}{Q}.
Specifically, the H
statistic reflects the ratio of the standard deviation of the underlying mean from a random-effects meta-analysis compared to the standard deviation from a fixed-effect meta-analysis; the I^2
statistic describes the proportion of total variance across studies that is due to heterogeneity rather than sampling error.
Outliers are frequently present in meta-analyses, and they may have great impact on the above heterogeneity measures. Alternatively, to be more robust to outliers, the test statistic may be modified as (Lin et al., 2017):
Q_{r} = \sum_{i = 1}^{n} \sqrt{w_i} |y_{i} - \bar{\mu}|.
Based on the Q_r
statistic, the method-of-moments estimate of the between-study variance \hat{\tau}_r^2
is defined as the solution to
Q_r \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}} = \sum_{i = 1}^{n} \left\{1 - \frac{w_{i}}{\sum_{j = 1}^{n} w_{j}} + \tau^{2} \left[ w_{i} - \frac{2 w_{i}^{2}}{\sum_{j = 1}^{n} w_{j}} + \frac{w_{i} \sum_{j = 1}^{n} w_{j}^{2}}{(\sum_{j = 1}^{n} w_{j})^2} \right]\right\}.
If no positive solution exists to the equation above, set \hat{\tau}_{r}^{2} = 0
. The counterparts of the H
and I^2
statistics are defined as
H_{r} = Q_r \sqrt{\pi/[2 n (n - 1)]};
I_{r}^{2} = \frac{Q_{r}^{2} - 2 n (n - 1) / \pi}{Q_{r}^{2}}.
To further improve the robustness of heterogeneity assessment, the weighted mean in the Q_r
statistic may be replaced by the weighted median \hat{\mu}_m
, which is the solution to \sum_{i = 1}^{n} w_i [I (\theta \geq y_i) - 0.5] = 0
with respect to \theta
. The new test statistic is
Q_m = \sum_{i = 1}^{n} \sqrt{w_i} |y_{i} - \hat{\mu}_m|.
Based on Q_m
, the new estimator of the between-study variance \hat{\tau}_m^2
is the solution to
Q_m \sqrt{\pi/2} = \sum_{i = 1}^{n} \sqrt{(s_i^2 + \tau^2)/s_i^2}.
The counterparts of the H
and I^2
statistics are
H_m = \frac{Q_m}{n} \sqrt{\pi/2};
I_m^2 = \frac{Q_m^2 - 2 n^2/\pi}{Q_m^2}.
Value
This function returns a list containing p-values of various heterogeneity tests and various heterogeneity measures with 95% confidence intervals. Specifically, the components include:
p.Q |
p-value of the |
p.Q.theo |
p-value of the |
p.Qr |
p-value of the |
p.Qm |
p-value of the |
Q |
the |
ci.Q |
95% CI of the |
tau2.DL |
DerSimonian–Laird estimate of the between-study variance. |
ci.tau2.DL |
95% CI of the between-study variance based on the DerSimonian–Laird method. |
H |
the |
ci.H |
95% CI of the |
I2 |
the |
ci.I2 |
95% CI of the |
Qr |
the |
ci.Qr |
95% CI of the |
tau2.r |
the between-study variance estimate based on the |
ci.tau2.r |
95% CI of the between-study variance based on the |
Hr |
the |
ci.Hr |
95% CI of the |
Ir2 |
the |
ci.Ir2 |
95% CI of the |
Qm |
the |
ci.Qm |
95% CI of the |
tau2.m |
the between-study variance estimate based on the |
ci.tau2.m |
95% CI of the between-study variance based on the |
Hm |
the |
ci.Hm |
95% CI of the |
Im2 |
the |
ci.Im2 |
95% CI of the |
References
DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986). "Meta-analysis in clinical trials." Controlled Clinical Trials, 7(3), 177–188. <doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2>
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG (2002). "Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis." Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539–1558. <doi: 10.1002/sim.1186>
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003). "Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses." BMJ, 327(7414), 557–560. <doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557>
Lin L, Chu H, Hodges JS (2017). "Alternative measures of between-study heterogeneity in meta-analysis: reducing the impact of outlying studies." Biometrics, 73(1), 156–166. <doi: 10.1111/biom.12543>
Examples
data("dat.aex")
set.seed(1234)
metahet(y, s2, dat.aex, 100)
metahet(y, s2, dat.aex, 1000)
data("dat.hipfrac")
set.seed(1234)
metahet(y, s2, dat.hipfrac, 100)
metahet(y, s2, dat.hipfrac, 1000)