cif_iptw_pseudo {adjustedCurves} | R Documentation |
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighted CIFs using Pseudo-Values
Description
This page explains the details of estimating inverse probability of treatment weighted cumulative incidence functions using Pseudo-Values in a competing risks setting (method="iptw_pseudo"
in the adjustedcif
function). All regular arguments of the adjustedcif
function can be used. Additionally, the treatment_model
argument has to be specified in the adjustedcif
call. Further arguments specific to this method are listed below.
Arguments
treatment_model |
[required] Must be either a model object with |
weight_method |
Method used in |
stabilize |
Whether to stabilize the weights or not. Is set to |
trim |
Can be either |
trim_quantiles |
Alternative argument to trim weights based on quantiles. Can be either |
se_method |
One of |
... |
Further arguments passed to |
Details
Type of Adjustment: Requires a model describing the treatment assignment mechanism. This must be either a
glm
ormultinom
object. Alternatively, weights can be supplied directly or estimated usingWeightIt
Doubly-Robust: Estimates are not Doubly-Robust.
Categorical groups: Any number of levels in
variable
are allowed. Must be a factor variable.Approximate Variance: Calculations to approximate the variance and confidence intervals are available.
Allowed Time Values: Allows both continuous and integer time.
Bounded Estimates: Estimates are not guaranteed to be bounded in the 0 to 1 probability range.
Monotone Function: Estimates are not guaranteed to be monotone.
Dependencies: This method relies on the prodlim package. The WeightIt package is also required if
treatment_model
is a formula object.
This method works by modeling the treatment assignment mechanism. Adjusted CIFs are calculated by first estimating appropriate case-weights for each observation in data
. This can be done using inverse probability of treatment weights using the propensity score (usually estimated using a logistic regression model) or by some other method (see weightit
). Pseudo-Values of the cause-specific CIF are then calculated for every observation in data
at some points in time T
. Since Pseudo-Values bypass the problem of censoring, a simple weighted average of the Pseudo-Values can be taken for every T
. See Andersen et al. (2017) for more details on this method and Andersen and Perme (2010) for more information on Pseudo-Values in general.
The standard error of this estimator can be approximated by calculation a weighted version of the standard error estimator. Interestingly, no exact method exists in the weighted case. Four approximations are implemented which can be chosen using the se_method
argument. The equations for "miller"
, "galloway"
and "cochrane"
are described and compared in Gatz and Smith (1995). "Hmisc"
is the standard equation with a weight term added, as specified in the Hmisc package, and should only be used with stabilized weights (stabilize=TRUE
). It is generally recommended to use bootstrap estimates instead.
Value
Adds the following additional objects to the output of the adjustedcif
function:
-
pseudo_values
: The matrix of estimated pseudo-values. -
weights
: The final weights used in the analysis.
Author(s)
Robin Denz
References
Per Kragh Andersen, Elisavet Syriopoulou, and Erik T. Parner (2017). "Causal Inference in Survival Analysis using Pseudo-Observations". In: Statistics in Medicine 36, pp. 2669-2681
Per Kragh Andersen and Maja Pohar Perme (2010). "Pseudo-Observations in Survival Analysis". In: Statistical Methods in Medical Research 19, pp. 71-99
Donald F. Gatz and Luther Smith (1995). "The Standard Error of a Weighted Mean Concentration - I: Bootstrapping Vs Other Methods". In: Atmospheric Environment 29.11, pp. 1185-1193
William G. Cochran (1977). Sampling Techniques. Vol. 3. New York: Wiley
J. N. Galloway, G. E. Likens, and M. E. Hawley (1984). "Acid Precipitation: Natural Versus Anthropogenic Components". In: Science 226, pp. 829-831
J. M. Miller (1977). A Statistical Evaluation of the U.S. Precipitation Chemistry Network. Precipitation Scavenging (edited by Semonin R. G. and Beadle R. W.) pp. 639-659. Available as CONF 74100 from National Technical Information Service, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Springfiel, VA.
See Also
Examples
library(adjustedCurves)
if (requireNamespace("prodlim") & requireNamespace("riskRegression")) {
set.seed(42)
# simulate some data as example
sim_dat <- sim_confounded_crisk(n=50, max_t=5)
sim_dat$group <- as.factor(sim_dat$group)
# estimate a treatment assignment model
glm_mod <- glm(group ~ x1 + x3 + x5 + x6, data=sim_dat, family="binomial")
# use it to calculate adjusted CIFs
adjcif <- adjustedcif(data=sim_dat,
variable="group",
ev_time="time",
event="event",
cause=1,
method="iptw_pseudo",
treatment_model=glm_mod)
plot(adjcif, force_bounds=TRUE, iso_reg=TRUE)
# Alternatively, use custom weights
# In this example we use weights calculated using the propensity score,
# which is equal to using the glm model directly in the function
ps_score <- glm_mod$fitted.values
weights <- ifelse(sim_dat$group==1, 1/ps_score, 1/(1-ps_score))
adjcif <- adjustedcif(data=sim_dat,
variable="group",
ev_time="time",
event="event",
cause=1,
method="iptw_pseudo",
treatment_model=weights)
plot(adjcif, force_bounds=TRUE, iso_reg=TRUE)
if (requireNamespace("WeightIt")) {
# And a third alternative: use the WeightIt package
# here an example with equal results to the ones above:
adjcif <- adjustedcif(data=sim_dat,
variable="group",
ev_time="time",
event="event",
cause=1,
method="iptw_pseudo",
treatment_model=group ~ x1 + x3 + x5 + x6,
weight_method="ps")
plot(adjcif, force_bounds=TRUE, iso_reg=TRUE)
# here an example using Entropy Balancing Weighting:
adjcif <- adjustedcif(data=sim_dat,
variable="group",
ev_time="time",
event="event",
cause=1,
method="iptw_pseudo",
treatment_model=group ~ x1 + x3 + x5 + x6,
weight_method="ebal")
plot(adjcif, force_bounds=TRUE, iso_reg=TRUE)
}
}