collect_metrics.workflow_set {workflowsets} | R Documentation |
Obtain and format results produced by tuning functions for workflow sets
Description
Return a tibble of performance metrics for all models or submodels.
Usage
## S3 method for class 'workflow_set'
collect_metrics(x, ..., summarize = TRUE)
## S3 method for class 'workflow_set'
collect_predictions(
x,
...,
summarize = TRUE,
parameters = NULL,
select_best = FALSE,
metric = NULL
)
## S3 method for class 'workflow_set'
collect_notes(x, ...)
Arguments
x |
A |
... |
Not currently used. |
summarize |
A logical for whether the performance estimates should be summarized via the mean (over resamples) or the raw performance values (per resample) should be returned along with the resampling identifiers. When collecting predictions, these are averaged if multiple assessment sets contain the same row. |
parameters |
An optional tibble of tuning parameter values that can be
used to filter the predicted values before processing. This tibble should
only have columns for each tuning parameter identifier (e.g. |
select_best |
A single logical for whether the numerically best results
are retained. If |
metric |
A character string for the metric that is used for
|
Details
When applied to a workflow set, the metrics and predictions that are returned do not contain the actual tuning parameter columns and values (unlike when these collect functions are run on other objects). The reason is that workflow sets can contain different types of models or models with different tuning parameters.
If the columns are needed, there are two options. First, the .config
column
can be used to merge the tuning parameter columns into an appropriate object.
Alternatively, the map()
function can be used to get the metrics from the
original objects (see the example below).
Value
A tibble.
Note
The package supplies two pre-generated workflow sets, two_class_set
and chi_features_set
, and associated sets of model fits
two_class_res
and chi_features_res
.
The two_class_*
objects are based on a binary classification problem
using the two_class_dat
data from the modeldata package. The six
models utilize either a bare formula or a basic recipe utilizing
recipes::step_YeoJohnson()
as a preprocessor, and a decision tree,
logistic regression, or MARS model specification. See ?two_class_set
for source code.
The chi_features_*
objects are based on a regression problem using the
Chicago
data from the modeldata package. Each of the three models
utilize a linear regression model specification, with three different
recipes of varying complexity. The objects are meant to approximate the
sequence of models built in Section 1.3 of Kuhn and Johnson (2019). See
?chi_features_set
for source code.
See Also
tune::collect_metrics()
, rank_results()
Examples
library(dplyr)
library(purrr)
library(tidyr)
two_class_res
# ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
collect_metrics(two_class_res)
# Alternatively, if the tuning parameter values are needed:
two_class_res %>%
dplyr::filter(grepl("cart", wflow_id)) %>%
mutate(metrics = map(result, collect_metrics)) %>%
dplyr::select(wflow_id, metrics) %>%
tidyr::unnest(cols = metrics)
collect_metrics(two_class_res, summarize = FALSE)