sctest.default {strucchangeRcpp} | R Documentation |
Structural Change Tests in Parametric Models
Description
Performs model-based tests for structural change (or parameter instability) in parametric models.
Usage
## Default S3 method:
sctest(x, order.by = NULL, functional = maxBB,
vcov = NULL, scores = estfun, decorrelate = TRUE, sandwich = TRUE,
parm = NULL, plot = FALSE, from = 0.1, to = NULL, nobs = NULL,
nrep = 50000, width = 0.15, xlab = NULL, ...)
Arguments
x |
a model object. The model class can in principle be arbitrary
but needs to provide suitable methods for extracting the |
order.by |
either a vector |
functional |
either a character specification of the functional
to be used or an |
vcov |
a function to extract the covariance matrix
for the coefficients of the fitted model:
|
scores |
a function which extracts the scores or estimating
function from the fitted object: |
decorrelate |
logical. Should the process be decorrelated? |
sandwich |
logical. Is the function |
parm |
integer or character specifying the component of the estimating functions which should be used (by default all components are used). |
plot |
logical. Should the result of the test also be visualized? |
from , to |
numeric. In case the |
nobs , nrep |
numeric. In case the |
width |
numeric. In case the |
xlab , ... |
graphical parameters passed to the plot method (in case
|
Details
sctest.default
is a convenience interface to gefp
for
structural change tests (or parameter instability tests) in general
parametric models. It proceeds in the following steps:
The generalized empirical fluctuation process (or score-based CUSUM process) is computed via
scus <- gefp(x, fit = NULL, ...)
where...
comprises the argumentsorder.by
,vcov
,scores
,decorrelate
,sandwich
,parm
that are simply passed on togefp
.The empirical fluctuation process is visualized (if
plot = TRUE
) viaplot(scus, functional = functional, ...)
.The empirical fluctuation is assessed by the corresponding significance test via
sctest(scus, functional = functional)
.
The main motivation for prociding the convenience interface is that these three steps can be easily carried out in one go along with a two convenience options:
By default, the covariance is computed by an outer-product of gradients estimator just as in
gefp
. This is always available based on thescores
. Additionally, by settingvcov = "info"
, the corresponding information matrix can be used. Then the average information is assumed to be provided by thevcov
method for the model class. (Note that this is only sensible for models estimated by maximum likelihood.)Instead of providing the
functional
by anefpFunctional
object, the test labels employed by Merkle and Zeileis (2013) and Merkle, Fan, and Zeileis (2013) can be used for convenience. Namely, for continuous numeric orderings, the following functionals are available:functional = "DM"
or"dmax"
provides the double-maximum test (maxBB
)."CvM"
is the Cramer-von Mises functionalmeanL2BB
."supLM"
or equivalently"maxLM"
is Andrews' supLM test (supLM
)."MOSUM"
or"maxMOSUM"
is the MOSUM functional (maxMOSUM
), and"range"
is the range functionalrangeBB
. Furthermore, several functionals suitable for (ordered) categoricalorder.by
variables are provided:"LMuo"
is the unordered LM test (catL2BB
),"WDMo"
is the weighted double-maximum test for ordered variables (ordwmax
), and"maxLMo"
is the maxLM test for ordered variables (ordL2BB
).
The theoretical model class is introduced in Zeileis and Hornik (2007) with a
unifying view in Zeileis (2005), especially from an econometric perspective.
Zeileis (2006) introduces the underling computational tools gefp
and
efpFunctional
.
Merkle and Zeileis (2013) discuss the methods in the context of measurement invariance which is particularly relevant to psychometric models for cross section data. Merkle, Fan, and Zeileis (2014) extend the results to ordered categorical variables.
Zeileis, Shah, and Patnaik (2013) provide a unifying discussion in the context of time series methods, specifically in financial econometrics.
Value
An object of class "htest"
containing:
statistic |
the test statistic, |
p.value |
the corresponding p value, |
method |
a character string with the method used, |
data.name |
a character string with the data name. |
References
Merkle E.C., Zeileis A. (2013), Tests of Measurement Invariance without Subgroups: A Generalization of Classical Methods. Psychometrika, 78(1), 59–82. doi:10.1007/S11336-012-9302-4
Merkle E.C., Fan J., Zeileis A. (2014), Testing for Measurement Invariance with Respect to an Ordinal Variable. Psychometrika, 79(4), 569–584. doi:10.1007/S11336-013-9376-7.
Zeileis A. (2005), A Unified Approach to Structural Change Tests Based on ML Scores, F Statistics, and OLS Residuals. Econometric Reviews, 24, 445–466. doi:10.1080/07474930500406053.
Zeileis A. (2006), Implementing a Class of Structural Change Tests: An Econometric Computing Approach. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 50, 2987–3008. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2005.07.001.
Zeileis A., Hornik K. (2007), Generalized M-Fluctuation Tests for Parameter Instability, Statistica Neerlandica, 61, 488–508. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9574.2007.00371.x.
Zeileis A., Shah A., Patnaik I. (2010), Testing, Monitoring, and Dating Structural Changes in Exchange Rate Regimes, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 54(6), 1696–1706. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2009.12.005.
See Also
Examples
## Zeileis and Hornik (2007), Section 5.3, Figure 6
data("Grossarl")
m <- glm(cbind(illegitimate, legitimate) ~ 1, family = binomial, data = Grossarl,
subset = time(fraction) <= 1800)
sctest(m, order.by = 1700:1800, functional = "CvM")