Concom {spatstat.model} | R Documentation |
The Connected Component Process Model
Description
Creates an instance of the Connected Component point process model which can then be fitted to point pattern data.
Usage
Concom(r)
Arguments
r |
Threshold distance |
Details
This function defines the interpoint interaction structure of a point process called the connected component process. It can be used to fit this model to point pattern data.
The function ppm()
, which fits point process models to
point pattern data, requires an argument
of class "interact"
describing the interpoint interaction
structure of the model to be fitted.
The appropriate description of the connected component interaction is
yielded by the function Concom()
. See the examples below.
In standard form, the connected component process
(Baddeley and Moller, 1989) with disc radius r
,
intensity parameter \kappa
and interaction parameter
\gamma
is a point process with probability density
f(x_1,\ldots,x_n) =
\alpha \kappa^{n(x)} \gamma^{-C(x)}
for a point pattern x
, where
x_1,\ldots,x_n
represent the
points of the pattern, n(x)
is the number of points in the
pattern, and C(x)
is defined below.
Here \alpha
is a normalising constant.
To define the term C(x)
, suppose that we construct a planar
graph by drawing an edge between
each pair of points x_i,x_j
which are less than
r
units apart. Two points belong to the same connected component
of this graph if they are joined by a path in the graph.
Then C(x)
is the number of connected components of the graph.
The interaction parameter \gamma
can be any positive number.
If \gamma = 1
then the model reduces to a Poisson
process with intensity \kappa
.
If \gamma < 1
then the process is regular,
while if \gamma > 1
the process is clustered.
Thus, a connected-component interaction process can be used to model either
clustered or regular point patterns.
In spatstat, the model is parametrised in a different form, which is easier to interpret. In canonical form, the probability density is rewritten as
f(x_1,\ldots,x_n) =
\alpha \beta^{n(x)} \gamma^{-U(x)}
where \beta
is the new intensity parameter and
U(x) = C(x) - n(x)
is the interaction potential.
In this formulation, each isolated point of the pattern contributes a
factor \beta
to the probability density (so the
first order trend is \beta
). The quantity
U(x)
is a true interaction potential, in the sense that
U(x) = 0
if the point pattern x
does not contain any
points that lie close together.
When a new point u
is added to an existing point pattern
x
, the rescaled potential -U(x)
increases by
zero or a positive integer.
The increase is zero if u
is not close to any point of x
.
The increase is a positive integer k
if there are
k
different connected components of x
that lie close to u
.
Addition of the point
u
contributes a factor \beta \eta^\delta
to the probability density, where \delta
is the
increase in potential.
If desired, the original parameter \kappa
can be recovered from
the canonical parameter by \kappa = \beta\gamma
.
The nonstationary connected component process is similar except that
the contribution of each individual point x_i
is a function \beta(x_i)
of location, rather than a constant beta.
Note the only argument of Concom()
is the threshold distance r
.
When r
is fixed, the model becomes an exponential family.
The canonical parameters \log(\beta)
and \log(\gamma)
are estimated by ppm()
, not fixed in
Concom()
.
Value
An object of class "interact"
describing the interpoint interaction
structure of the connected component process with disc radius r
.
Edge correction
The interaction distance of this process is infinite.
There are no well-established procedures for edge correction
for fitting such models, and accordingly the model-fitting function
ppm
will give an error message saying that the user must
specify an edge correction. A reasonable solution is
to use the border correction at the same distance r
, as shown in the
Examples.
Author(s)
Adrian Baddeley Adrian.Baddeley@curtin.edu.au, Rolf Turner rolfturner@posteo.net and Ege Rubak rubak@math.aau.dk
References
Baddeley, A.J. and Moller, J. (1989) Nearest-neighbour Markov point processes and random sets. International Statistical Review 57, 89–121.
See Also
ppm
,
pairwise.family
,
ppm.object
Examples
# prints a sensible description of itself
Concom(r=0.1)
# Fit the stationary connected component process to redwood data
ppm(redwood ~1, Concom(r=0.07), rbord=0.07)
# Fit the stationary connected component process to `cells' data
ppm(cells ~1, Concom(r=0.06), rbord=0.06)
# eta=0 indicates hard core process.
# Fit a nonstationary connected component model
# with log-cubic polynomial trend
ppm(swedishpines ~polynom(x/10,y/10,3), Concom(r=7), rbord=7)