ddi_dataColl {rddi} | R Documentation |
dataColl and its children
Description
Information about the data collection methodology employed in the codebook. More information on these elements, especially their allowed attributes, can be found in the references.
Usage
ddi_dataColl(...)
ddi_actMin(...)
ddi_cleanOps(...)
ddi_collectorTraining(...)
ddi_collMode(...)
ddi_collSitu(...)
ddi_ConOps(...)
ddi_dataCollector(...)
ddi_deviat(...)
ddi_frequenc(...)
ddi_instrumentDevelopment(...)
ddi_resInstru(...)
ddi_sampProc(...)
ddi_timeMeth(...)
ddi_weight(...)
Arguments
... |
Child nodes or attributes. |
Details
Parent nodes
dataColl
is contained in method
.
dataColl specific child nodes
-
ddi_actMin()
is the summary of actions taken to minimize data loss. Includes information on actions such as follow-up visits, supervisory checks, historical matching, estimation, etc. -
ddi_cleanOps()
are the methods used to "clean" the data collection, e.g., consistency checking, wild code checking, etc. The "agency" attribute permits specification of the agency doing the data cleaning. -
ddi_collectorTraining()
describes the training provided to data collectors including interviewer training, process testing, compliance with standards etc. This is repeatable for language and to capture different aspects of the training process. The type attribute allows specification of the type of training being described. -
ddi_collMode()
is the method used to collect the data; instrumentation characteristics. -
ddi_collSitu()
is the description of noteworthy aspects of the data collection situation. Includes information on factors such as cooperativeness of respondents, duration of interviews, number of call-backs, etc. -
ddi_ConOps()
are control operations. These are methods to facilitate data control performed by the primary investigator or by the data archive. Specify any special programs used for such operations. The "agency" attribute maybe used to refer to the agency that performed the control operation. -
ddi_dataCollector()
is the entity (individual, agency, or institution) responsible for administering the questionnaire or interview or compiling the data. This refers to the entity collecting the data, not to the entity producing the documentation. -
ddi_deviat()
are major deviations from the sample design. This is information indicating correspondence as well as discrepancies between the sampled units (obtained) and available statistics for the population (age, sex-ratio, marital status, etc.) as a whole. -
ddi_frequenc()
is the frequency of data collection. It's for data collected at more than one point in time. -
ddi_instrumentDevelopment()
describes any development work on the data collection instrument. -
ddi_resInstru()
is the type of data collection instrument used. -
ddi_sampProc()
is the type of sample and sample design used to select the survey respondents to represent the population. May include reference to the target sample size and the sampling fraction. -
ddi_weight()
defines the weights used to produce accurate statistical results within the sampling procedures. Describe here the criteria for using weights in analysis of a collection. If a weighting formula or coefficient was developed, provide this formula, define its elements, and indicate how the formula is applied to data.
Value
A ddi_node object.
Shared and complex child nodes
References
collectorTraining documentation
instrumentDevelopment documentation
Examples
ddi_dataColl()
# Functions that need to be wrapped in ddi_dataColl()
ddi_actMin("To minimize the number of unresolved cases and reduce the
potential nonresponse bias, four follow-up contacts were made with
agencies that had not responded by various stages of the data
collection process.")
ddi_cleanOps("Checks for undocumented codes were performed, and data were
subsequently revised in consultation with the principal investigator.")
ddi_collectorTraining(type = "interviewer training",
"Describe research project, describe population and
sample, suggest methods and language for approaching
subjects, explain questions and key terms of survey instrument.")
ddi_collMode("telephone interviews")
ddi_collSitu("There were 1,194 respondents who answered questions in face-to-face
interviews lasting approximately 75 minutes each.")
ddi_ConOps(agency = "ICPSR",
"Ten percent of data entry forms were reentered to check for accuracy.")
ddi_dataCollector(abbr = "SRC",
affiliation = "University of Michigan",
role = "questionnaire administration",
"Survey Research Center")
ddi_deviat("The suitability of Ohio as a research site reflected its similarity
to the United States as a whole. The evidence extended by Tuchfarber
(1988) shows that Ohio is representative of the United States in
several ways: percent urban and rural, percent of the population
that is African American, median age, per capita income, percent
living below the poverty level, and unemployment rate. Although
results generated from an Ohio sample are not empirically
generalizable to the United States, they may be suggestive of what
might be expected nationally.")
ddi_frequenc("monthly")
ddi_instrumentDevelopment(type = "pretesting",
"The questionnaire was pre-tested with split-panel
tests, as well as an analysis of non-response rates
for individual items, and response distributions.")
ddi_resInstru("structured")
ddi_sampProc("National multistage area probability sample")
ddi_weight("The 1996 NES dataset includes two final person-level analysis weights
which incorporate sampling, nonresponse, and post-stratification
factors. One weight (variable #4) is for longitudinal micro-level
analysis using the 1996 NES Panel. The other weight (variable #3)
is for analysis of the 1996 NES combined sample (Panel component
cases plus Cross-section supplement cases). In addition, a Time
Series Weight (variable #5) which corrects for Panel attrition was
constructed. This weight should be used in analyses which compare
the 1996 NES to earlier unweighted National Election Study data
collections.")