AIBS {rankrate} | R Documentation |
Real peer review data set from the American Institute of Biological Sciences (AIBS)
Description
This real data set includes 12 judges (reviewers) and 28 objects (proposals), and demonstrates the ability of the Mallows-Binomial model to combine ratings and rankings for the purpose of demarcating real grant proposals for a funding agency.
Usage
AIBS
Format
A list with three elements: (1) rankings
, a 12 x 18 matrix of rankings with one row per judge;
(2) ratings
, a 12 x 18 matrix of ratings, with one row per judge and one column per object; and
(3) M
, a number indicating the maximum (worst) integer score.
Source
Originally published in: Gallo, Stephen A.. "Grant Peer Review Scoring Data with Criteria Scores" (2023). https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/Grant_Peer_Review_Scoring_Data_with_Criteria_Scores/12728087/1.
Originally analyzed in: Gallo, Stephen A., et al. "A new approach to peer review assessments: Score, then rank" (2023). Research Integrity and Peer Review 8:10 (10). https://researchintegrityjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s41073-023-00131-7.