diag_ratio_T {r4lineups} | R Documentation |
Diagnosticty Ratio (Tredoux, 1998)
Description
Computes Wells's adjusted diagnosticity ratio for one lineup pair (see: Tredoux, 1998)
Usage
diag_ratio_T(lineup_pres, lineup_abs, pos_pres, pos_abs, k1, k2)
Arguments
lineup_pres |
A numeric vector of lineup choices for a lineup in which the target was present |
lineup_abs |
A numeric vector of lineup choices for a lineup in which the target was absent |
pos_pres |
A scalar, representing target position in TP lineup. Must be declared by user |
pos_abs |
A scalar, representing target position in TA lineup. Must be declared by user |
k1 |
Number of targets in TP lineup. Must be specified by user (scalar). |
k2 |
Number of targets in TA lineup. Must be specified by user (scalar). |
References
Malpass, R. S. (1981). Effective size and defendant bias in eyewitness identification lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 5(4), 299-309.
Malpass, R. S., Tredoux, C., & McQuiston-Surrett, D. (2007). Lineup construction and lineup fairness. In R. Lindsay, D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology, Vol. 2: Memory for people (pp. 155-178). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tredoux, C. G. (1998). Statistical inference on measures of lineup fairness. Law and Human Behavior, 22(2), 217-237.
Tredoux, C. (1999). Statistical considerations when determining measures of lineup size and lineup bias. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, S9-S26.
Wells, G. L.,Leippe, M. R., & Ostrom, T. M. (1979). Guidelines for empirically assessing the fairness of a lineup. Law and Human Behavior, 3(4), 285-293.
Examples
#Data:
lineup_pres <- round(runif(100, 1, 6))
lineup_abs <- round(runif(70, 1, 5))
pos_pres <- 3
pos_abs <- 5
#Call:
diag_ratio_T(lineup_pres, lineup_abs, pos_pres, pos_abs, 6, 5)
diag_ratio_T(lineup_pres, lineup_abs, 3, 5, 6, 5)