Ops.permutation {permutations} | R Documentation |
Arithmetic Ops Group Methods for permutations
Description
Allows arithmetic operators to be used for manipulation of permutation objects such as addition, multiplication, division, integer powers, etc.
Usage
## S3 method for class 'permutation'
Ops(e1, e2)
cycle_power(x,pow)
cycle_power_single(x,pow)
cycle_sum(e1,e2)
cycle_sum_single(c1,c2)
word_equal(e1,e2)
word_prod(e1,e2)
word_prod_single(e1,e2)
permprod(x)
vps(vec,pow)
ccps(n,pow)
helper(e1,e2)
cycle_plus_integer_elementwise(x,y)
conjugation(e1,e2)
Arguments
x , e1 , e2 |
Objects of class “ |
c1 , c2 |
Objects of class |
pow |
Integer vector of powers |
vec |
In function |
n |
In function |
y |
In experimental function
|
Details
Function Ops.permutation()
passes binary arithmetic
operators (“+
”, “*
”, “/
”,
“^
”, and “==
”) to the appropriate
specialist function.
Multiplication, as in a*b
, is effectively
word_prod(a,b)
; it coerces its arguments to word form (because
a*b = b[a]
).
Raising permutations to integer powers, as in a^n
, is
cycle_power(a,n)
; it coerces a
to cycle form and returns
a cycle (even if n=1
). Negative and zero values of n
operate as expected. Function cycle_power()
is vectorized; it
calls cycle_power_single()
, which is not. This calls
vps()
(“Vector Power Single”), which checks for simple
cases such as pow=0
or the identity permutation; and function
vps()
calls function ccps()
which performs the actual
number-theoretic manipulation to raise a cycle to a power.
Group-theoretic conjugation is implemented: in package idiom,
a^b
gives inverse(b)*a*b
. The notation is motivated by
the identities x^(yz)=(x^y)^z
and (xy)^z=x^z*y^z
[or
x^{yz}=(x^y)^z
and (xy)^z=x^zy^z
].
Internally, conjugation()
is called. The concept of conjugate
permutations [that is, permutations with the same
shape()
] is discussed at conjugate.
The sum of two permutations a
and b
, as in
a+b
, is defined if the cycle representations of the addends are
disjoint. The sum is defined as the permutation given by juxtaposing
the cycles of a
with those of b
. Note that this
operation is commutative. If a
and b
do not have
disjoint cycle representations, an error is returned. This is useful
if you want to guarantee that two permutations commute (NB:
permutation a
commutes with a^i
for i
any
integer, and in particular a
commutes with itself. But
a+a
returns an error: the operation checks for disjointness,
not commutativity).
Permutation “division”, as in a/b
, is
a*inverse(b)
. Note that a/b*c
is evaluated left to
right so is equivalent to a*inverse(b)*c
. See note.
Function helper()
sorts out recycling for binary functions, the
behaviour of which is inherited from cbind()
, which also
handles the names of the returned permutation.
Experimental functionality is provided to define the “sum” of a
permutation and an integer. If x
is a permutation in cycle
form with x=(abc)
, say, and n
an integer, then
x+n=(a+n,b+n,c+n)
: each element of each cycle of x
is increased by n
. Note that this has associativity
consequences. For example, x+(x+n)
might be defined but not
(x+x)+n
, as the two “+
” operators have different
interpretations. Distributivity is similarly broken (see the
examples). Package idiom includes x-n
[defined as x +
(-n)
] and n+x
but not n-x
as inverses are defined
multiplicatively. The implementation is vectorised.
Value
None of these functions are really intended for the end user: use the ops as shown in the examples section.
Note
The class of the returned object is the appropriate one.
Unary operators to invert a permutation are problematic in the
package. I do not like using “id/x
” to represent a
permutation inverse: the idiom introduces an utterly redundant
object (“id
”), and forces the use of a binary operator
where a unary operator is needed. Similar comments apply to
“x^-1
”, which again introduces a redundant object
(-1
) and uses a binary operator.
Currently, “-x
” returns the multiplicative inverse of
x
, but this is not entirely satisfactory either, as it uses
additive notation: the rest of the package uses multiplicative
notation. Thus x*-x == id
, which looks a little odd but OTOH
noone has a problem with x^-1
for inverses.
I would like to follow APL and use “/x
”,
but this does not seem to be possible in R. The natural
unary operator would be the exclamation mark “!x
”.
However, redefining the exclamation mark to give permutation
inverses, while possible, is not desirable because its precedence is
too low. One would like !x*y
to return inverse(x)*y
but instead standard precedence rules means that it returns
inverse(x*y)
. Earlier versions of the package interpreted
!x
as inverse(x)
, but it was a disaster: to implement
the commutator [x,y]=x^{-1}y^{-1}xy
,
for example, one would like to use !x*!y*x*y
, but this is
interpreted as !(x*(!y*(x*y)))
; one has to use
(!x)*(!y)*x*y
. I found myself having to use heaps of
brackets everywhere. This caused such severe cognitive dissonance
that I removed exclamation mark for inverses from the package. I
might reinstate it in the future. There does not appear to be a way
to define a new unary operator due to the construction of the
parser.
Author(s)
Robin K. S. Hankin
Examples
x <- rperm(10,9) # word form
y <- rperm(10,9) # word form
x*y # products are given in word form but the print method coerces to cycle form
print_word(x*y)
x^5 # powers are given in cycle form
x^as.cycle(1:5) # conjugation (not integer power!); coerced to word.
x*inverse(x) == id # all TRUE
# the 'sum' of two permutations is defined if their cycles are disjoint:
as.cycle(1:4) + as.cycle(7:9)
data(megaminx)
megaminx[1] + megaminx[7:12]
rperm() + 100
z <- cyc_len(4)
z
z+100
z + 0:5
(z + 0:5)*z
w <- cyc_len(7) + 1
(w+1)*(w-1)