add_max_richness_objective {oppr} | R Documentation |
Add maximum richness objective
Description
Set the objective of a project prioritization problem()
to
maximize the total number of features that are expected to persist, whilst
ensuring that the cost of the solution is within a pre-specified budget
(Joseph, Maloney & Possingham 2009). This objective is conceptually similar
to maximizing species richness in a study area. Furthermore, weights can
also be used to specify the relative importance of conserving specific
features (see add_feature_weights()
).
Usage
add_max_richness_objective(x, budget)
Arguments
x |
ProjectProblem object. |
budget |
|
Details
A problem objective is used to specify the overall goal of the
project prioritization problem.
Here, the maximum richness objective seeks to find the set of actions that
maximizes the total number of features (e.g. populations, species,
ecosystems) that is expected to persist within a pre-specified budget.
Let represent the set of conservation actions (indexed by
). Let
denote the cost for funding action
, and
let
denote the maximum expenditure (i.e. the budget). Also,
let
represent each feature (indexed by
),
represent the weight for each feature
(defaults to one for
each feature unless specified otherwise), and
denote the
probability that each feature will go extinct given the funded
conservation projects.
To guide the prioritization, the conservation actions are organized into
conservation projects. Let denote the set of conservation projects
(indexed by
), and let
denote which actions
comprise each conservation project
using zeros and ones. Next, let
represent
the probability of project
being successful if it is funded. Also,
let
denote the probability that each feature
associated with the project
will persist if all of the actions that comprise project
are funded
and that project is allocated to feature
. For convenience,
let
denote the actual probability that each
associated with the project
is expected to persist if the project is funded. If the argument
to
adjust_for_baseline
in the problem
function was set to
TRUE
, and this is the default behavior, then
, where
n
corresponds to the
baseline "do nothing" project. This means that the probability
of a feature persisting if a project is allocated to a feature
depends on (i) the probability of the project succeeding, (ii) the
probability of the feature persisting if the project does not fail,
and (iii) the probability of the feature persisting even if the project
fails. Otherwise, if the argument is set to FALSE
, then
.
The binary control variables in this problem indicate whether
each project
is funded or not. The decision
variables in this problem are the
,
, and
variables.
Specifically, the binary
variables indicate if project
is funded or not based on which actions are funded; the binary
variables indicate if project
is used to manage
feature
or not; and the semi-continuous
variables
denote the probability that feature
will go extinct.
Now that we have defined all the data and variables, we can formulate
the problem. For convenience, let the symbol used to denote each set also
represent its cardinality (e.g. if there are ten features, let
represent the set of ten features and also the number ten).
The objective (eqn 1a) is to maximize the weighted persistence of all the
species. Constraint (eqn 1b) limits the maximum expenditure (i.e. ensures
that the cost of the funded actions do not exceed the budget).
Constraints (eqn 1c) calculate the probability that each feature
will go extinct according to their allocated project.
Constraints (eqn 1d) ensure that feature can only be allocated to projects
that have all of their actions funded. Constraints (eqn 1e) state that each
feature can only be allocated to a single project. Constraints (eqn 1f)
ensure that a project cannot be funded unless all of its actions are funded.
Constraints (eqns 1g) ensure that the probability variables
() are bounded between zero and one. Constraints (eqns 1h) ensure
that the action funding (
), project funding (
), and project
allocation (
) variables are binary.
Value
ProjectProblem object with the objective added to it.
References
Joseph LN, Maloney RF & Possingham HP (2009) Optimal allocation of resources among threatened species: A project prioritization protocol. Conservation Biology, 23, 328–338.
See Also
Examples
# load data
data(sim_projects, sim_features, sim_actions)
# build problem with maximum richness objective and $300 budget
p1 <- problem(sim_projects, sim_actions, sim_features,
"name", "success", "name", "cost", "name") %>%
add_max_richness_objective(budget = 200) %>%
add_binary_decisions()
## Not run:
# solve problem
s1 <- solve(p1)
# print solution
print(s1)
# plot solution
plot(p1, s1)
## End(Not run)
# build another problem that includes feature weights
p2 <- p1 %>%
add_feature_weights("weight")
## Not run:
# solve problem with feature weights
s2 <- solve(p2)
# print solution based on feature weights
print(s2)
# plot solution based on feature weights
plot(p2, s2)
## End(Not run)