multinomineq-package {multinomineq}R Documentation

multinomineq: Bayesian Inference for Inequality-Constrained Multinomial Models

Description

multinomineq

Implements Gibbs sampling and Bayes factors for multinomial models with convex, linear-inequality constraints on the probability parameters. This includes models that predict a linear order of binomial probabilities (e.g., p1 < p2 < p3 < .50) and mixture models, which assume that the parameter vector p must be inside the convex hull of a finite number of vertices.

Details

A formal definition of inequality-constrained multinomial models and the implemented computational methods for Bayesian inference is provided in:

Inequality-constrained multinomial models have applications in multiple areas in psychology, judgement and decision making, and beyond:

Author(s)

Daniel W. Heck

References

Bröder, A., & Schiffer, S. (2003). Bayesian strategy assessment in multi-attribute decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16(3), 193-213. doi:10.1002/bdm.442

Bröder, A., & Schiffer, S. (2003). Take The Best versus simultaneous feature matching: Probabilistic inferences from memory and effects of reprensentation format. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 277-293. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.277

Heck, D. W., Hilbig, B. E., & Moshagen, M. (2017). From information processing to decisions: Formalizing and comparing probabilistic choice models. Cognitive Psychology, 96, 26-40. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.05.003

Hilbig, B. E., & Moshagen, M. (2014). Generalized outcome-based strategy classification: Comparing deterministic and probabilistic choice models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(6), 1431-1443. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0643-0

Regenwetter, M., & Davis-Stober, C. P. (2012). Behavioral variability of choices versus structural inconsistency of preferences. Psychological Review, 119(2), 408-416. doi:10.1037/a0027372

Regenwetter, M., Davis-Stober, C. P., Lim, S. H., Guo, Y., Popova, A., Zwilling, C., … Messner, W. (2014). QTest: Quantitative testing of theories of binary choice. Decision, 1(1), 2-34. doi:10.1037/dec0000007

Karabatsos, G. (2005). The exchangeable multinomial model as an approach to testing deterministic axioms of choice and measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 49(1), 51-69. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2004.11.001

Myung, J. I., Karabatsos, G., & Iverson, G. J. (2005). A Bayesian approach to testing decision making axioms. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 49, 205-225. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2005.02.004

Karabatsos, G., & Sheu, C.-F. (2004). Order-constrained Bayes inference for dichotomous models of unidimensional nonparametric IRT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28(2), 110-125. doi:10.1177/0146621603260678

Hoijtink, H. (2011). Informative Hypotheses: Theory and Practice for Behavioral and Social Scientists. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.

Hoijtink, H., Béland, S., & Vermeulen, J. A. (2014). Cognitive diagnostic assessment via Bayesian evaluation of informative diagnostic hypotheses. Psychological Methods, 19(1), 21–38. doi:10.1037/a0034176

Klugkist, I., & Hoijtink, H. (2007). The Bayes factor for inequality and about equality constrained models. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 51(12), 6367-6379. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2007.01.024

Klugkist, I., Laudy, O., & Hoijtink, H. (2010). Bayesian evaluation of inequality and equality constrained hypotheses for contingency tables. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 281-299. doi:10.1037/a0020137

Heathcote, A., Brown, S., Wagenmakers, E. J., & Eidels, A. (2010). Distribution-free tests of stochastic dominance for small samples. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54(5), 454-463. doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2010.06.005

See Also

Useful links:


[Package multinomineq version 0.2.6 Index]