| mult_bf_inequality {multibridge} | R Documentation |
Computes Bayes Factors For Inequality Constrained Multinomial Parameters
Description
Computes Bayes factor for inequality constrained multinomial parameters using a bridge sampling routine.
Restricted hypothesis H_r states that category proportions follow a particular trend.
Alternative hypothesis H_e states that category proportions are free to vary.
Usage
mult_bf_inequality(
samples = NULL,
restrictions = NULL,
x = NULL,
Hr = NULL,
a = rep(1, ncol(samples)),
factor_levels = NULL,
prior = FALSE,
index = 1,
maxiter = 1000,
seed = NULL,
niter = 5000,
nburnin = niter * 0.05
)
Arguments
samples |
matrix of dimension |
restrictions |
|
x |
numeric. Vector with data |
Hr |
string or character. Encodes the user specified informed hypothesis. Use either specified |
a |
numeric. Vector with concentration parameters of Dirichlet distribution. Must be the same length as |
factor_levels |
character. Vector with category names. Must be the same length as |
prior |
logical. If |
index |
numeric. Index of current restriction. Default is 1 |
maxiter |
numeric. Maximum number of iterations for the iterative updating scheme used in the bridge sampling routine. Default is 1,000 to avoid infinite loops |
seed |
numeric. Sets the seed for reproducible pseudo-random number generation |
niter |
numeric. Vector with number of samples to be drawn from truncated distribution |
nburnin |
numeric. A single value specifying the number of burn-in samples when drawing from the truncated distribution. Minimum number of burn-in samples is 10. Default is 5% of the number of samples. Burn-in samples are removed automatically after the sampling. |
Details
The model assumes that data follow a multinomial distribution and assigns a Dirichlet distribution as prior for the model parameters (i.e., underlying category proportions). That is:
x ~ Multinomial(N, \theta)
\theta ~ Dirichlet(\alpha)
Value
List consisting of the following elements:
$eval-
-
q11: log prior or posterior evaluations for prior or posterior samples -
q12: log proposal evaluations for prior or posterior samples -
q21: log prior or posterior evaluations for samples from proposal -
q22: log proposal evaluations for samples from proposal
-
$niternumber of iterations of the iterative updating scheme
$logmlestimate of log marginal likelihood
$hypevaluated inequality constrained hypothesis
$error_measures-
-
re2: the approximate relative mean-squared error for the marginal likelihood estimate -
cv: the approximate coefficient of variation for the marginal likelihood estimate (assumes that bridge estimate is unbiased) -
percentage: the approximate percentage error of the marginal likelihood estimate
-
Note
The following signs can be used to encode restricted hypotheses: "<" and ">" for inequality constraints, "=" for equality constraints,
"," for free parameters, and "&" for independent hypotheses. The restricted hypothesis can either be a string or a character vector.
For instance, the hypothesis c("theta1 < theta2, theta3") means
-
theta1is smaller than boththeta2andtheta3 The parameters
theta2andtheta3both havetheta1as lower bound, but are not influenced by each other.
The hypothesis c("theta1 < theta2 = theta3 & theta4 > theta5") means that
Two independent hypotheses are stipulated:
"theta1 < theta2 = theta3"and"theta4 > theta5"The restrictions on the parameters
theta1,theta2, andtheta3do not influence the restrictions on the parameterstheta4andtheta5.-
theta1is smaller thantheta2andtheta3 -
theta2andtheta3are assumed to be equal -
theta4is larger thantheta5
References
Damien P, Walker SG (2001). “Sampling truncated normal, beta, and gamma densities.” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 10, 206–215.
Gronau QF, Sarafoglou A, Matzke D, Ly A, Boehm U, Marsman M, Leslie DS, Forster JJ, Wagenmakers E, Steingroever H (2017). “A tutorial on bridge sampling.” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 81, 80–97.
Frühwirth-Schnatter S (2004). “Estimating marginal likelihoods for mixture and Markov switching models using bridge sampling techniques.” The Econometrics Journal, 7, 143–167.
Sarafoglou A, Haaf JM, Ly A, Gronau QF, Wagenmakers EJ, Marsman M (2021). “Evaluating Multinomial Order Restrictions with Bridge Sampling.” Psychological Methods.
See Also
Other functions to evaluate informed hypotheses:
binom_bf_equality(),
binom_bf_inequality(),
binom_bf_informed(),
mult_bf_equality(),
mult_bf_informed()
Examples
# priors
a <- c(1, 1, 1, 1)
# informed hypothesis
factor_levels <- c('theta1', 'theta2', 'theta3', 'theta4')
Hr <- c('theta1', '<', 'theta2', '<', 'theta3', '<', 'theta4')
results_prior <- mult_bf_inequality(Hr=Hr, a=a, factor_levels=factor_levels,
prior=TRUE, seed = 2020)
# corresponds to
cbind(exp(results_prior$logml), 1/factorial(4))
# alternative - if you have samples and a restriction list
inequalities <- generate_restriction_list(Hr=Hr, a=a,
factor_levels=factor_levels)$inequality_constraints
prior_samples <- mult_tsampling(inequalities, niter = 2e3,
prior=TRUE, seed = 2020)
results_prior <- mult_bf_inequality(prior_samples, inequalities, seed=2020)
cbind(exp(results_prior$logml), 1/factorial(4))