hmmMV {msm}

Multivariate hidden Markov models

Description

Constructor for a a multivariate hidden Markov model (HMM) where each of the n variables observed at the same time has a (potentially different) standard univariate distribution conditionally on the underlying state. The n outcomes are independent conditionally on the hidden state.

Usage

hmmMV(...)

Arguments

...

The number of arguments supplied should equal the maximum number of observations made at one time. Each argument represents the univariate distribution of that outcome conditionally on the hidden state, and should be the result of calling a univariate hidden Markov model constructor (see hmm-dists).

Details

If a particular state in a HMM has such an outcome distribution, then a call to hmmMV is supplied as the corresponding element of the hmodel argument to msm. See Example 2 below.

A multivariate HMM where multiple outcomes at the same time are generated from the same distribution is specified in the same way as the corresponding univariate model, so that hmmMV is not required. The outcome data are simply supplied as a matrix instead of a vector. See Example 1 below.

The outcome data for such models are supplied as a matrix, with number of columns equal to the maximum number of arguments supplied to the hmmMV calls for each state. If some but not all of the variables are missing (NA) at a particular time, then the observed data at that time still contribute to the likelihood. The missing data are assumed to be missing at random. The Viterbi algorithm may be used to predict the missing values given the fitted model and the observed data.

Typically the outcome model for each state will be from the same family or set of families, but with different parameters. Theoretically, different numbers of distributions may be supplied for different states. If a particular state has fewer outcomes than the maximum, then the data for that state are taken from the first columns of the response data matrix. However this is not likely to be a useful model, since the number of observations will probably give information about the underlying state, violating the missing at random assumption.

Models with outcomes that are dependent conditionally on the hidden state (e.g. correlated multivariate normal observations) are not currently supported.

Value

A list of objects, each of class hmmdist as returned by the univariate HMM constructors documented in hmm-dists. The whole list has class hmmMVdist, which inherits from hmmdist.

Author(s)

C. H. Jackson [e-mail]

References

Jackson, C. H., Su, L., Gladman, D. D. and Farewell, V. T. (2015) On modelling minimal disease activity. Arthritis Care and Research (early view).

See Also

hmm-dists,msm

Examples

## Simulate data from a Markov model 
nsubj <- 30; nobspt <- 5
sim.df <- data.frame(subject = rep(1:nsubj, each=nobspt),
                     time = seq(0, 20, length=nobspt))
set.seed(1)
two.q <- rbind(c(-0.1, 0.1), c(0, 0))
dat <- simmulti.msm(sim.df[,1:2], qmatrix=two.q, drop.absorb=FALSE)

### EXAMPLE 1
## Generate two observations at each time from the same outcome
## distribution:
## Bin(40, 0.1) for state 1, Bin(40, 0.5) for state 2
dat$obs1[dat$state==1] <- rbinom(sum(dat$state==1), 40, 0.1)
dat$obs2[dat$state==1] <- rbinom(sum(dat$state==1), 40, 0.1)
dat$obs1[dat$state==2] <- rbinom(sum(dat$state==2), 40, 0.5)
dat$obs2[dat$state==2] <- rbinom(sum(dat$state==2), 40, 0.5)
dat$obs <- cbind(obs1 = dat$obs1, obs2 = dat$obs2)

## Fitted model should approximately recover true parameters 
msm(obs ~ time, subject=subject, data=dat, qmatrix=two.q,
    hmodel = list(hmmBinom(size=40, prob=0.2),
                  hmmBinom(size=40, prob=0.2)))

### EXAMPLE 2
## Generate two observations at each time from different
## outcome distributions:
## Bin(40, 0.1) and Bin(40, 0.2) for state 1, 
dat$obs1 <- dat$obs2 <- NA
dat$obs1[dat$state==1] <- rbinom(sum(dat$state==1), 40, 0.1)
dat$obs2[dat$state==1] <- rbinom(sum(dat$state==1), 40, 0.2)

## Bin(40, 0.5) and Bin(40, 0.6) for state 2
dat$obs1[dat$state==2] <- rbinom(sum(dat$state==2), 40, 0.6)
dat$obs2[dat$state==2] <- rbinom(sum(dat$state==2), 40, 0.5)
dat$obs <- cbind(obs1 = dat$obs1, obs2 = dat$obs2)

## Fitted model should approximately recover true parameters 
msm(obs ~ time, subject=subject, data=dat, qmatrix=two.q,   
    hmodel = list(hmmMV(hmmBinom(size=40, prob=0.3),
                        hmmBinom(size=40, prob=0.3)),                 
                 hmmMV(hmmBinom(size=40, prob=0.3),
                       hmmBinom(size=40, prob=0.3))),
    control=list(maxit=10000))