MillerCalib {modEvA} | R Documentation |
Miller's calibration satistics for logistic regression models
Description
This function calculates Miller's (1991) calibration statistics for a presence probability model – namely, the intercept and slope of a logistic regression of the response variable on the logit of predicted probabilities. Optionally and by default, it also plots the corresponding regression line over the reference diagonal (identity line). If the model is well calibrated, the line should lie along (or at least be nearly parallel to) the reference diagonal, i.e. the slope should ideally equal 1 (i.e., 45 degrees).
Usage
MillerCalib(model = NULL, obs = NULL, pred = NULL, plot = TRUE,
line.col = "black", diag = TRUE, diag.col = "grey",
plot.values = TRUE, digits = 2, xlab = "", ylab = "",
main = "Miller calibration", na.rm = TRUE, rm.dup = FALSE, ...)
Arguments
model |
a binary-response model object of class "glm", "gam", "gbm", "randomForest" or "bart". If this argument is provided, 'obs' and 'pred' will be extracted with |
obs |
alternatively to 'model' and together with 'pred', a numeric vector of observed presences (1) and absences (0) of a binary response variable. Alternatively (and if 'pred' is a 'SpatRaster'), a two-column matrix or data frame containing, respectively, the x (longitude) and y (latitude) coordinates of the presence points, in which case the 'obs' vector will be extracted with |
pred |
alternatively to 'model' and together with 'obs', a vector with the corresponding predicted values of presence probability, habitat suitability, environmental favourability or alike. Must be of the same length and in the same order as 'obs'. Alternatively (and if 'obs' is a set of point coordinates), a 'SpatRaster' map of the predicted values for the entire evaluation region, in which case the 'pred' vector will be extracted with |
plot |
logical, whether or not to produce a plot of the Miller regression line. Defaults to TRUE. |
line.col |
colour for the Miller regression line (if plot = TRUE). |
diag |
logical, whether or not to add the reference diagonal (if plot = TRUE). Defaults to TRUE. |
diag.col |
line colour for the reference diagonal. |
plot.values |
logical, whether or not to report the values of the intercept and slope on the plot. Defaults to TRUE. |
digits |
integer number indicating the number of digits to which the values in the plot should be rounded. Dafaults to 2. This argument is ignored if 'plot' or 'plot.values' are set to FALSE. |
xlab |
label for the x axis. |
ylab |
label for the y axis. |
main |
title for the plot. |
na.rm |
Logical value indicating whether missing values should be ignored in computations. Defaults to TRUE. |
rm.dup |
If |
... |
additional arguments to pass to |
Details
Calibration or reliability measures how a model's predicted probabilities relate to observed species prevalence or proportion of presences in the modelled data (Pearce & Ferrier 2000; Wintle et al. 2005; Franklin 2010). If predictions are perfectly calibrated, the slope will equal 1 and the intercept will equal 0, so the model's calibation line will perfectly overlap with the reference diagonal or identity line.
Note that Miller's statistics assess the model globally: a model is well calibrated if the average of all predicted probabilities equals the proportion of presences in the modelled data. For logistic regression models, perfect calibration is always attained on the same data used for building the model (Miller 1991); Miller's calibration statistics are mainly useful when projecting a model outside those training data.
Calibration can be separated into two measurable components, bias and spread, and a third component, unexplained error. Bias describes a consistent overestimate or underestimate of presence probability, which is reflected by a Miller intercept above or below 0 (i.e., a model line above or below the reference diagonal). Spread describes a departure of the model line from the 45-degree slope. A slope greater than 1 indicates that predicted values above 0.5 are underestimating, and values below 0.5 are overestimating, the probability of presence. A slope smaller than 1 (while greater than 0) implies that predicted values below 0.5 are underestimating, and values above 0.5 are overestimating, the probability of presence (Pearce & Ferrier 2000). A Miller slope very different from 1 indicates a poorly calibrated model. The unexplained error component can be assessed, though only in part, through residual analysis (Miller 1991; Pearce & Ferrier 2000).
While Miller's calibration statistics were originally conceived for generalized linear models with binomial distribution and logit link (Miller 1991), they may also apply to other models that also estimate presence probability, including those that use different link functions such as probit or cloglog. Regardless of how they get there, these models attempt to estimate presence probabilities as well calibrated as possible, and the logit is the canonical link for the Bernoulli distribution which is appropriate for a binary response variable. Indeed, the Miller slope is visibly worse when those other link functions are used for computing it.
Miller's calibration slope (though not the intercept) is also adequate to assess the calibration of other predictions related to presence probability, such as suitability and favourability (see e.g. 'Fav' function in the fuzzySim package). Indeed, the slope is the same for presence probability and its corresponding favourability value (see Examples, bottom).
Value
This function returns a list of two integer values:
intercept |
the calibration intercept. |
slope |
the calibration slope. |
If plot = TRUE
, a plot will be produced with the model calibration line, optionally (if diag = TRUE) over the reference diagonal, and optionally (if plot.values = TRUE) with the intercept and slope values printed on it.
Author(s)
A. Marcia Barbosa
References
Franklin, J. (2010) Mapping Species Distributions: Spatial Inference and Prediction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Miller M.E., Hui S.L. & Tierney W.M. (1991) Validation techniques for logistic regression models. Statistics in Medicine, 10: 1213-1226
Pearce J. & Ferrier S. (2000) Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. Ecological Modelling, 133: 225-245
Wintle B.A., Elith J. & Potts J.M. (2005) Fauna habitat modelling and mapping: A review and case study in the Lower Hunter Central Coast region of NSW. Austral Ecology, 30: 719-738
See Also
HLfit
, Dsquared
, RsqGLM
, Boyce
Examples
# load sample models:
data(rotif.mods)
# choose a particular model to play with:
mod <- rotif.mods$models[[1]]
MillerCalib(model = mod)
MillerCalib(model = mod, plot.values = FALSE)
MillerCalib(model = mod, main = "Model calibration line")
# you can also use MillerCalib with vectors of observed and predicted values
# instead of a model object:
MillerCalib(obs = mod$y, pred = mod$fitted.values)
# 'obs' can also be a table of presence point coordinates
# and 'pred' a SpatRaster of predicted values
# Miller slope can also apply to predictions other than probability:
## Not run:
# (the following code requires the 'fuzzySim' pkg installed)
MillerCalib(obs = mod$y, pred = mod$fitted.values) # probability
fav <- fuzzySim::Fav(model = mod) # favourability
MillerCalib(obs = mod$y, pred = fav) # same slope, different intercept
## End(Not run)