get_influence_scores {metaggR} | R Documentation |
Calculate the Influence Scores
Description
This function computes and plots the influence scores described in Palley & Satopää (2021): Boosting the Wisdom of Crowds Within a Single Judgment Problem: Weighted Averaging Based on Peer Predictions. The current version of the paper is available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Papers.cfm?abstract_id=3504286
Usage
get_influence_scores(E, P, plotIt = FALSE, cutoff = 7/2)
Arguments
E |
Vector of |
P |
Vector of |
plotIt |
A boolean value. If TRUE, then the function call produces two side-by-side plots:
For more information on the plots, see the Electronic Companion of Palley & Satopää (2021): Boosting the Wisdom of Crowds Within a Single Judgment Problem: Weighted Averaging Based on Peer Predictions at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Papers.cfm?abstract_id=3504286. |
cutoff |
A positive scalar describing the cutoff value for the outlier-robust knowledge-weighted estimate.
The outlier-robust version calculates the influence scores for all
judges. Each influence score is then compared against |
Value
J
vector of influence scores. Intuitively, the influence score of a judge represents the amount by which the
knowledge-weighted estimate would change if that judge was removed from the crowd. Judges with an exceptionally
high influence should be inspected. As a default cutoff value, the authors recommend 7/2
times the interquartile range
of the individual judges' influence scores.
Examples
# Illustration on the Three Gorges Dam Example in Palley & Satopää (2021):
# The original example with 6 judges is augmented with a 7th judge with an extreme response.
# Judges' estimates:
E2 = c(50, 134, 206, 290, 326, 374, 1000)
# Judges' predictions of others
P2 = c(26, 92, 116, 218, 218, 206, 400)
# The influence score of the 7th judge is much higher than the other judges' scores.
# This judge's response should be inspected and potentially excluded from
# the final knowledge-weighted estimate.
get_influence_scores(E2,P2)