pareto-k-diagnostic {loo} | R Documentation |
Diagnostics for Pareto smoothed importance sampling (PSIS)
Description
Print a diagnostic table summarizing the estimated Pareto shape parameters
and PSIS effective sample sizes, find the indexes of observations for which
the estimated Pareto shape parameter k
is larger than some
threshold
value, or plot observation indexes vs. diagnostic estimates.
The Details section below provides a brief overview of the
diagnostics, but we recommend consulting Vehtari, Gelman, and Gabry (2017)
and Vehtari, Simpson, Gelman, Yao, and Gabry (2024) for full details.
Usage
pareto_k_table(x)
pareto_k_ids(x, threshold = NULL)
pareto_k_values(x)
pareto_k_influence_values(x)
psis_n_eff_values(x)
mcse_loo(x, threshold = NULL)
## S3 method for class 'psis_loo'
plot(
x,
diagnostic = c("k", "ESS", "n_eff"),
...,
label_points = FALSE,
main = "PSIS diagnostic plot"
)
## S3 method for class 'psis'
plot(
x,
diagnostic = c("k", "ESS", "n_eff"),
...,
label_points = FALSE,
main = "PSIS diagnostic plot"
)
Arguments
x |
|
threshold |
For |
diagnostic |
For the |
label_points , ... |
For the |
main |
For the |
Details
The reliability and approximate convergence rate of the PSIS-based
estimates can be assessed using the estimates for the shape
parameter k
of the generalized Pareto distribution. The
diagnostic threshold for Pareto k
depends on sample size
S
(sample size dependent threshold was introduced by Vehtari
et al. (2024), and before that fixed thresholds of 0.5 and 0.7 were
recommended). For simplicity, loo
package uses the nominal sample
size S
when computing the sample size specific
threshold. This provides an optimistic threshold if the effective
sample size is less than 2200, but if MCMC-ESS > S/2 the difference
is usually negligible. Thinning of MCMC draws can be used to
improve the ratio ESS/S.
If
k < min(1 - 1 / log10(S), 0.7)
, whereS
is the sample size, the PSIS estimate and the corresponding Monte Carlo standard error estimate are reliable.If
1 - 1 / log10(S) <= k < 0.7
, the PSIS estimate and the corresponding Monte Carlo standard error estimate are not reliable, but increasing the (effective) sample sizeS
above 2200 may help (this will increase the sample size specific threshold(1-1/log10(2200)>0.7
and then the bias specific threshold 0.7 dominates).If
0.7 <= k < 1
, the PSIS estimate and the corresponding Monte Carlo standard error have large bias and are not reliable. Increasing the sample size may reduce the variability ink
estimate, which may result in lowerk
estimate, too.If
k \geq 1
, the target distribution is estimated to have a non-finite mean. The PSIS estimate and the corresponding Monte Carlo standard error are not well defined. Increasing the sample size may reduce the variability in thek
estimate, which may also result in a lowerk
estimate.
What if the estimated tail shape parameter k
exceeds the diagnostic threshold?
Importance sampling is likely to
work less well if the marginal posterior p(\theta^s | y)
and
LOO posterior p(\theta^s | y_{-i})
are very different, which
is more likely to happen with a non-robust model and highly
influential observations. If the estimated tail shape parameter
k
exceeds the diagnostic threshold, the user should be
warned. (Note: If k
is greater than the diagnostic threshold
then WAIC is also likely to fail, but WAIC lacks as accurate
diagnostic.) When using PSIS in the context of approximate LOO-CV,
we recommend one of the following actions:
With some additional computations, it is possible to transform the MCMC draws from the posterior distribution to obtain more reliable importance sampling estimates. This results in a smaller shape parameter
k
. Seeloo_moment_match()
and the vignette Avoiding model refits in leave-one-out cross-validation with moment matching for an example of this.Sampling from a leave-one-out mixture distribution (see the vignette Mixture IS leave-one-out cross-validation for high-dimensional Bayesian models), directly from
p(\theta^s | y_{-i})
for the problematic observationsi
, or usingK
-fold cross-validation (see the vignette Holdout validation and K-fold cross-validation of Stan programs with the loo package) will generally be more stable.Using a model that is more robust to anomalous observations will generally make approximate LOO-CV more stable.
Observation influence statistics
The estimated shape parameter
k
for each observation can be used as a measure of the observation's
influence on posterior distribution of the model. These can be obtained with
pareto_k_influence_values()
.
Effective sample size and error estimates
In the case that we
obtain the samples from the proposal distribution via MCMC the loo
package also computes estimates for the Monte Carlo error and the effective
sample size for importance sampling, which are more accurate for PSIS than
for IS and TIS (see Vehtari et al (2024) for details). However, the PSIS
effective sample size estimate will be
over-optimistic when the estimate of k
is greater than
min(1-1/log10(S), 0.7)
, where S
is the sample size.
Value
pareto_k_table()
returns an object of class
"pareto_k_table"
, which is a matrix with columns "Count"
,
"Proportion"
, and "Min. n_eff"
, and has its own print method.
pareto_k_ids()
returns an integer vector indicating which
observations have Pareto k
estimates above threshold
.
pareto_k_values()
returns a vector of the estimated Pareto
k
parameters. These represent the reliability of sampling.
pareto_k_influence_values()
returns a vector of the estimated Pareto
k
parameters. These represent influence of the observations on the
model posterior distribution.
psis_n_eff_values()
returns a vector of the estimated PSIS
effective sample sizes.
mcse_loo()
returns the Monte Carlo standard error (MCSE)
estimate for PSIS-LOO. MCSE will be NA if any Pareto k
values are
above threshold
.
The plot()
method is called for its side effect and does not
return anything. If x
is the result of a call to loo()
or psis()
then plot(x, diagnostic)
produces a plot of
the estimates of the Pareto shape parameters (diagnostic = "k"
) or
estimates of the PSIS effective sample sizes (diagnostic = "ESS"
).
References
Vehtari, A., Gelman, A., and Gabry, J. (2017). Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC. Statistics and Computing. 27(5), 1413–1432. doi:10.1007/s11222-016-9696-4 (journal version, preprint arXiv:1507.04544).
Vehtari, A., Simpson, D., Gelman, A., Yao, Y., and Gabry, J. (2024). Pareto smoothed importance sampling. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 25(72):1-58. PDF
See Also
-
psis()
for the implementation of the PSIS algorithm. The FAQ page on the loo website for answers to frequently asked questions.