| hips {jarbes} | R Documentation |
Meta-analysis:
Description
Meta-analysis of 15 studies investigating total hip replacement to compare the risk of revision of cemented and uncemented implantfixation modalities, by pooling treatment effectestimates from OS and RCTs.
Format
A dataframe with 15 rows and 12 columns. Each row represents study results, the columns are:
- Study
Author and year.
- Study_type
Study desing.
- N_of_revisions
Number of revisions.
- Total_cemented
Total number of cemmented cases.
- N_of_revisions_uncemented
Number of uncemented revisions.
- Total_uncemented
Total number of uncemmented cases.
- Relative_risks_computed
RR calculated from the two by two table.
- L95CI
Lower 95prc CI
- U95CI
Upper 95prc CI
- mean_age
Mean age of the study
- proportion_of_women
Proportion of women in the study.
- Follow_up
Time to follow-up in years.
Source
Schnell-Inderst P, Iglesias CP, Arvandi M, Ciani O, Matteucci Gothe R, Peters J, Blom AW, Taylor RS and Siebert U (2017). A bias-adjusted evidence synthesis of RCT and observational data: the case of total hip replacement. Health Econ. 26(Suppl. 1): 46–69.