zlm {fairml} | R Documentation |
Zafar's Linear and Logistic Regressions
Description
Linear and logistic regression models enforcing fairness by bounding the covariance between sensitive attributes and predictors.
Usage
# a fair linear regression model.
zlm(response, predictors, sensitive, unfairness)
zlm.orig(response, predictors, sensitive, max.abs.cov)
# a fair logistic regression model.
zlrm(response, predictors, sensitive, unfairness)
zlrm.orig(response, predictors, sensitive, max.abs.cov)
Arguments
response |
a numeric vector, the response variable. |
predictors |
a numeric matrix or a data frame containing numeric and factor columns; the predictors. |
sensitive |
a numeric matrix or a data frame containing numeric and factor columns; the sensitive attributes. |
unfairness |
a positive number in [0, 1], how unfair is the model allowed
to be. A value of |
max.abs.cov |
a non-negative number, the original bound on the maximum absolute covariance from Zafar et al. (2019). |
Details
zlm()
and zlrm()
define fairness as statistical parity.
Estimation minimizes the log-likelihood of the regression models under the
constraint that the correlation between each sensitive attribute and the
fitted values (on the linear predictor scale, in the case of logistic
regression) is smaller than unfairness
in absolute value. Both models
include predictors
as explanatory variables; the variables
sensitive
only appear in the constraints.
The only difference between zlm()
and zlm.orig()
, and between
zlrm()
and zlrm.orig()
, is that the latter uses the original
constraint on the covariances of the individual sensitive attributes from
Zafar et al. (2019).
Value
zlm()
and zlm.orig()
return an object of class
c("zlm", "fair.model")
.
zlrm()
and zlrm.orig()
return an object of class
c("zlrm", "fair.model")
.
Author(s)
Marco Scutari
References
Zafar BJ, Valera I, Gomez-Rodriguez M, Gummadi KP (2019). "Fairness
Constraints: a Flexible Approach for Fair Classification". Journal of
Machine Learning Research, 30:1–42.
https://www.jmlr.org/papers/volume20/18-262/18-262.pdf