commitmentQ {dySEM}

Ratings of relational satisfaction and commitment from 282 (Q)ueer couples

Description

A data set containing 5 ratings of satisfaction and 5 ratings of commitment for each member of a dyad in which one or more members identify as LGBTQ+. Measured using the Investment Model Scale subscales (Rusbult, Martz, & Agnew, 1998). Data are from Sakaluk, Fisher, and Kilshaw (2021). Variable names follow a stem-partner-item ("spi") order, with a delimiter (".") between the stem and distinguishing partner character, and another delimiter ("_") between the distinguishing partner character and item number.

Usage

data(commitmentQ)

Format

A data frame with 118 rows and 20 variables:

sat.g.1_1

Satisfaction item 1 for partner1

sat.g.1_2

Satisfaction item 2 for partner1

sat.g.1_3

Satisfaction item 3 for partner1

sat.g.1_4

Satisfaction item 4 for partner1

sat.g.1_5

Satisfaction item 5 for partner1

com.1_1

Commitment items item 1 for partner1

com.1_2

Commitment items item 2 for partner1

com.1_3

Commitment items item 3 for partner1

com.1_4

Commitment items item 4 for partner1

com.1_5

Commitment items item 5 for partner1

sat.g.2_1

Satisfaction item 1 for partner 2

sat.g.2_2

Satisfaction item 2 for partner 2

sat.g.2_3

Satisfaction item 3 for partner 2

sat.g.2_4

Satisfaction item 4 for partner 2

sat.g.2_5

Satisfaction item 5 for partner 2

com.2_1

Commitment items item 1 for partner 2

com.2_2

Commitment items item 2 for partner 2

com.2_3

Commitment items item 3 for partner 2

com.2_4

Commitment items item 4 for partner 2

com.2_5

Commitment items item 5 for partner 2

References

Sakaluk, J. K., Fisher, A. N., & Kilshaw, R. E.(2021). Dyadic measurement invariance and its importance for replicability in romantic relationship research. Personal Relationships, 28(1), 190-226. .#'