brm_archetype_successive_cells {brms.mmrm} | R Documentation |
Cell-means-like successive differences archetype
Description
Create an informative prior archetype where the fixed effects are successive differences between adjacent time points.
Usage
brm_archetype_successive_cells(
data,
intercept = FALSE,
baseline = !is.null(attr(data, "brm_baseline")),
baseline_subgroup = !is.null(attr(data, "brm_baseline")) && !is.null(attr(data,
"brm_subgroup")),
baseline_subgroup_time = !is.null(attr(data, "brm_baseline")) && !is.null(attr(data,
"brm_subgroup")),
baseline_time = !is.null(attr(data, "brm_baseline")),
covariates = TRUE,
clda = FALSE,
prefix_interest = "x_",
prefix_nuisance = "nuisance_"
)
Arguments
data |
A classed data frame from |
intercept |
|
baseline |
Logical of length 1.
|
baseline_subgroup |
Logical of length 1. |
baseline_subgroup_time |
Logical of length 1.
|
baseline_time |
Logical of length 1.
|
covariates |
Logical of length 1.
|
clda |
Some archetypes cannot support cLDA
(e.g. In cLDA, the fixed effects parameterization
is restricted such that all treatment groups are pooled at baseline.
(If you supplied a |
prefix_interest |
Character string to prepend to the new columns
of generated fixed effects of interest (relating to group, subgroup,
and/or time).
In rare cases, you may need to set a non-default prefix to prevent
name conflicts with existing columns in the data, or rename
the columns in your data.
|
prefix_nuisance |
Same as |
Details
In this archetype, each fixed effect is either an intercept on the first time point or the difference between two adjacent time points, and each treatment group has its own set of fixed effects independent of the other treatment groups.
To illustrate, suppose the dataset has two treatment groups A and B,
time points 1, 2, and 3, and no other covariates.
Let mu_gt
be the marginal mean of the response at group
g
time t
given data and hyperparameters.
The model has fixed effect parameters beta_1
, beta_2
, ..., beta_6
which express the marginal means mu_gt
as follows:
`mu_A1 = beta_1` `mu_A2 = beta_1 + beta_2` `mu_A3 = beta_1 + beta_2 + beta_3` `mu_B1 = beta_4` `mu_B2 = beta_4 + beta_5` `mu_B3 = beta_4 + beta_5 + beta_6`
For group A, beta_1
is the time 1 intercept, beta_2
represents
time 2 minus time 1, and beta_3
represents time 3 minus time 2.
beta_4
, beta_5
, and beta_6
behave analogously for group B.
Value
A special classed tibble
with data tailored to
the successive differences archetype. The dataset is augmented with
extra columns with the "archetype_"
prefix, as well as special
attributes to tell downstream functions like brm_formula()
what to
do with the object.
Nuisance variables
In the presence of covariate adjustment, functions like
brm_archetype_successive_cells()
convert nuisance factors into binary
dummy variables, then center all those dummy variables and any
continuous nuisance variables at their means in the data.
This ensures that the main model coefficients
of interest are not implicitly conditional on a subset of the data.
In other words, preprocessing nuisance variables this way preserves
the interpretations of the fixed effects of interest, and it ensures
informative priors can be specified correctly.
Prior labeling for brm_archetype_successive_cells()
Within each treatment group, each intercept is labeled by the earliest
time point, and each successive difference term gets the successive
time point as the label.
To illustrate, consider the example in the Details section.
In the labeling scheme for brm_archetype_successive_cells()
,
you can label the prior on beta_1
using
brm_prior_label(code = "normal(1.2, 5)", group = "A", time = "1")
.
Similarly, you cal label the prior on beta_5
with
brm_prior_label(code = "normal(1.3, 7)", group = "B", time = "2")
.
To confirm that you set the prior correctly, compare the brms
prior
with the output of summary(your_archetype)
.
See the examples for details.
Prior labeling
Informative prior archetypes use a labeling scheme to assign priors to fixed effects. How it works:
1. First, assign the prior of each parameter a collection of labels from the data. This can be done manually or with successive calls to [brm_prior_label()]. 2. Supply the labeling scheme to [brm_prior_archetype()]. [brm_prior_archetype()] uses attributes of the archetype to map labeled priors to their rightful parameters in the model.
For informative prior archetypes, this process is much more convenient
and robust than manually calling brms::set_prior()
.
However, it requires an understanding of how the labels of the priors
map to parameters in the model. This mapping varies from archetype
to archetype, and it is documented in the help pages of
archetype-specific functions such as brm_archetype_successive_cells()
.
See Also
Other informative prior archetypes:
brm_archetype_average_cells()
,
brm_archetype_average_effects()
,
brm_archetype_cells()
,
brm_archetype_effects()
,
brm_archetype_successive_effects()
Examples
set.seed(0L)
data <- brm_simulate_outline(
n_group = 2,
n_patient = 100,
n_time = 4,
rate_dropout = 0,
rate_lapse = 0
) |>
dplyr::mutate(response = rnorm(n = dplyr::n())) |>
brm_data_change() |>
brm_simulate_continuous(names = c("biomarker1", "biomarker2")) |>
brm_simulate_categorical(
names = c("status1", "status2"),
levels = c("present", "absent")
)
dplyr::select(
data,
group,
time,
patient,
starts_with("biomarker"),
starts_with("status")
)
archetype <- brm_archetype_successive_cells(data)
archetype
summary(archetype)
formula <- brm_formula(archetype)
formula
prior <- brm_prior_label(
code = "normal(1, 2.2)",
group = "group_1",
time = "time_2"
) |>
brm_prior_label("normal(1, 3.3)", group = "group_1", time = "time_3") |>
brm_prior_label("normal(1, 4.4)", group = "group_1", time = "time_4") |>
brm_prior_label("normal(2, 2.2)", group = "group_2", time = "time_2") |>
brm_prior_label("normal(2, 3.3)", group = "group_2", time = "time_3") |>
brm_prior_label("normal(2, 4.4)", group = "group_2", time = "time_4") |>
brm_prior_archetype(archetype)
prior
class(prior)
if (identical(Sys.getenv("BRM_EXAMPLES", unset = ""), "true")) {
tmp <- utils::capture.output(
suppressMessages(
suppressWarnings(
model <- brm_model(
data = archetype,
formula = formula,
prior = prior,
chains = 1,
iter = 100,
refresh = 0
)
)
)
)
suppressWarnings(print(model))
brms::prior_summary(model)
draws <- brm_marginal_draws(
data = archetype,
formula = formula,
model = model
)
summaries_model <- brm_marginal_summaries(draws)
summaries_data <- brm_marginal_data(data)
brm_plot_compare(model = summaries_model, data = summaries_data)
}