FixedContBinIT {Surrogate} | R Documentation |
Fits (univariate) fixed-effect models to assess surrogacy in the case where the true endpoint is continuous and the surrogate endpoint is binary (based on the Information-Theoretic framework)
Description
The function FixedContBinIT
uses the information-theoretic approach (Alonso & Molenberghs, 2007) to estimate trial- and individual-level surrogacy based on fixed-effect models when T is continuous normally distributed and S is binary. The user can specify whether a (weighted or unweighted) full, semi-reduced, or reduced model should be fitted. See the Details section below.
Usage
FixedContBinIT(Dataset, Surr, True, Treat, Trial.ID, Pat.ID,
Model=c("Full"), Weighted=TRUE, Min.Trial.Size=2, Alpha=.05,
Number.Bootstraps=50,Seed=sample(1:1000, size=1))
Arguments
Dataset |
A |
Surr |
The name of the variable in |
True |
The name of the variable in |
Treat |
The name of the variable in |
Trial.ID |
The name of the variable in |
Pat.ID |
The name of the variable in |
Model |
The type of model that should be fitted, i.e., |
Weighted |
Logical. In practice it is often the case that different trials (or other clustering units) have different sample sizes. Univariate models are used to assess surrogacy in the information-theoretic approach, so it can be useful to adjust for heterogeneity in information content between the trial-specific contributions (particularly when trial-level surrogacy measures are of primary interest and when the heterogeneity in sample sizes is large). If |
Min.Trial.Size |
The minimum number of patients that a trial should contain to be included in the analysis. If the number of patients in a trial is smaller than the value specified by |
Alpha |
The |
Number.Bootstraps |
The standard error and confidence interval for |
Seed |
The seed to be used in the bootstrap procedure. Default |
Details
Individual-level surrogacy
The following univariate generalised linear models are fitted:
where and
are the trial and subject indicators,
is an appropriate link function (i.e., a logit link for binary endpoints and an identity link for normally distributed continuous endpoints),
and
are the surrogate and true endpoint values of subject
in trial
, and
is the treatment indicator for subject
in trial
.
and
are the trial-specific intercepts and treatment-effects on the true endpoint in trial
.
and
are the trial-specific intercepts and treatment-effects on the true endpoint in trial
after accounting for the effect of the surrogate endpoint.
The log likelihood values of the previous models in each of the
trials (i.e.,
and
, respectively) are subsequently used to compute individual-level surrogacy based on the so-called Variance Reduction Factor (VFR; for details, see Alonso & Molenberghs, 2007):
where is the number of trials and
is the number of patients within trial
.
When it can be assumed (i) that the treatment-corrected association between the surrogate and the true endpoint is constant across trials, or (ii) when all data come from a single clinical trial (i.e., when ), the previous expression simplifies to:
Trial-level surrogacy
When a full or semi-reduced model is requested (by using the argument Model=c("Full")
or Model=c("SemiReduced")
in the function call), trial-level surrogacy is assessed by fitting the following univariate models:
where and
are the trial and subject indicators,
and
are the surrogate and true endpoint values of subject
in trial
,
is the treatment indicator for subject
in trial
,
and
are the fixed trial-specific intercepts for S and T, and
and
are the fixed trial-specific treatment effects on S and T, respectively. The error terms
and
are assumed to be independent.
When a reduced model is requested by the user (by using the argument Model=c("Reduced")
in the function call), the following univariate models are fitted:
where and
are the common intercepts for S and T. The other parameters are the same as defined above, and
and
are again assumed to be independent.
When the user requested a full model approach (by using the argument Model=c("Full")
in the function call, i.e., when models (1) were fitted), the following model is subsequently fitted:
where the parameter estimates for ,
, and
are based on models (1) (see above). When a weighted model is requested (using the argument
Weighted=TRUE
in the function call), model (3) is a weighted regression model (with weights based on the number of observations in trial ). The
log likelihood value of the (weighted or unweighted) model (3) (
) is subsequently compared to the
log likelihood value of an intercept-only model (
;
), and
is computed based based on the Variance Reduction Factor (for details, see Alonso & Molenberghs, 2007):
where is the number of trials.
When a semi-reduced or reduced model is requested (by using the argument Model=c("SemiReduced")
or Model=c("Reduced")
in the function call), the following model is fitted:
where the parameter estimates for and
are based on models (1) when a semi-reduced model is fitted or on models (2) when a reduced model is fitted. The
log likelihood value of this (weighted or unweighted) model (
) is subsequently compared to the
log likelihood value of an intercept-only model (
;
), and
is computed based on the reduction in the likelihood (as described above).
Value
An object of class FixedContBinIT
with components,
Data.Analyze |
Prior to conducting the surrogacy analysis, data of patients who have a missing value for the surrogate and/or the true endpoint are excluded. In addition, the data of trials (i) in which only one type of the treatment was administered, and (ii) in which either the surrogate or the true endpoint was a constant (i.e., all patients within a trial had the same surrogate and/or true endpoint value) are excluded. In addition, the user can specify the minimum number of patients that a trial should contain in order to include the trial in the analysis. If the number of patients in a trial is smaller than the value specified by |
Obs.Per.Trial |
A |
Trial.Spec.Results |
A |
R2ht |
A |
R2h |
A |
R2h.ind |
A |
R2h.Ind.By.Trial |
A |
Author(s)
Wim Van der Elst, Ariel Alonso, & Geert Molenberghs
References
Alonso, A, & Molenberghs, G. (2007). Surrogate marker evaluation from an information theory perspective. Biometrics, 63, 180-186.
See Also
FixedBinBinIT
, FixedBinContIT, plot Information-Theoretic BinCombn
Examples
## Not run: # Time consuming (>5sec) code part
# Generate data with continuous Surr and True
Sim.Data.MTS(N.Total=2000, N.Trial=100, R.Trial.Target=.8,
R.Indiv.Target=.8, Seed=123, Model="Full")
# Make S binary
Data.Observed.MTS$Surr_Bin <- Data.Observed.MTS$Surr
Data.Observed.MTS$Surr_Bin[Data.Observed.MTS$Surr>=0] <- 1
Data.Observed.MTS$Surr_Bin[Data.Observed.MTS$Surr<0] <- 0
# Analyze data
Fit <- FixedContBinIT(Dataset = Data.Observed.MTS, Surr = Surr_Bin,
True = True, Treat = Treat, Trial.ID = Trial.ID, Pat.ID = Pat.ID,
Model = "Full", Number.Bootstraps=50)
# Examine results
summary(Fit)
plot(Fit, Trial.Level = FALSE, Indiv.Level.By.Trial=TRUE)
plot(Fit, Trial.Level = TRUE, Indiv.Level.By.Trial=FALSE)
## End(Not run)