loa_lme {SimplyAgree}R Documentation

Limits of Agreement with Linear Mixed Effects

Description

[Stable]

This function allows for the calculation of (parametric) bootstrapped limits of agreement when there are multiple observations per subject. The package author recommends using tolerance_limit as an alternative to this function.

Usage

loa_lme(
  diff,
  avg,
  condition = NULL,
  id,
  data,
  type = c("perc", "norm", "basic"),
  conf.level = 0.95,
  agree.level = 0.95,
  replicates = 999,
  prop_bias = FALSE,
  het_var = FALSE
)

Arguments

diff

Column name of the data frame that includes the difference between the 2 measurements of interest.

avg

Column name of the data frame that includes the average of the 2 measurements of interest.

condition

Column name indicating different conditions subjects were tested under. This can be left missing if there are no differing conditions to be tested.

id

Column name indicating the subject/participant identifier

data

A data frame containing the variables within the model.

type

A character string representing the type of bootstrap confidence intervals. Only "norm", "basic", and "perc" currently supported. Bias-corrected and accelerated, bca, is the default. See ?boot::boot.ci for more details.

conf.level

The confidence level required. Default is 95%.

agree.level

The agreement level required. Default is 95%.

replicates

The number of bootstrap replicates. Passed on to the boot function. Default is 999.

prop_bias

Logical indicator (default is FALSE) of whether proportional bias should be considered for the limits of agreement calculations.

het_var

Logical indicator (default is FALSE) of whether to assume homogeneity of variance in each condition.

Value

Returns single list with the results of the agreement analysis.

References

Parker, R. A., Weir, C. J., Rubio, N., Rabinovich, R., Pinnock, H., Hanley, J., McLoughan, L., Drost, E.M., Mantoani, L.C., MacNee, W., & McKinstry, B. (2016). "Application of mixed effects limits of agreement in the presence of multiple sources of variability: exemplar from the comparison of several devices to measure respiratory rate in COPD patients". PLOS One, 11(12), e0168321. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0168321


[Package SimplyAgree version 0.2.0 Index]