SmoothingIndex {PerformanceAnalytics} | R Documentation |
calculate Normalized Getmansky Smoothing Index
Description
Proposed by Getmansky et al to provide a normalized measure of "liquidity risk."
Usage
SmoothingIndex(R, neg.thetas = FALSE, MAorder = 2, verbose = FALSE, ...)
Arguments
R |
an xts, vector, matrix, data frame, timeSeries or zoo object of asset returns |
neg.thetas |
if FALSE, function removes negative coefficients (thetas) when calculating the index |
MAorder |
specify the number of periods used to calculate the moving average, defaults to 2 |
verbose |
if TRUE, return a list containing the Thetas in addition to the smoothing index/ |
... |
any other passthru parameters |
Details
To measure the effects of smoothing, Getmansky, Lo, et al (2004) define a "smoothing profile" as a vector of coefficients for an MLE fit on returns using a two-period moving-average process.
The moving-average process of order k=2
(specified using
MAorder
) gives R_t = \theta_{0} R_{t} + \theta_1 R_{t -1} +
\theta_2 R_{t-2}
, under the constraint that the sum of the coefficients is
equal to 1. In , the arima
function allows us to create an MA(2)
model using an "ARIMA(p,d,q)" model, where p
is the number of
autoregressive terms (AR), d
is the degree of differencing, and
q
is the number of lagged forecast errors (MA) in the prediction
equation. The order
parameter allows us to specify the three
components (p, d, q)
as an argument, e.g., order = c(0, 0, 2)
.
The method
specifies how to fit the model, in this case using maximum
likelihood estimation (MLE) in a fashion similar to the estimation of
standard moving-average time series models, using:
arima(ra, order=c(0,0,2), method="ML", transform.pars=TRUE,
include.mean=FALSE)
include.mean
: Getmansky, et al. (2004) p 555 "By applying the above
procedure to observed de-meaned returns...", so we set that parameter to
'FALSE'.
transform.pars
: ibid, "we impose the additional restriction that the
estimated MA(k) process be invertible," so we set the parameter to 'TRUE'.
The coefficients, \theta_{j}
, are then normalized to sum to
interpreted as a "weighted average of the fund's true returns over the most
recent k + 1
periods, including the current period."
If these weights are disproportionately centered on a small number of lags, relatively little serial correlation will be induced. However, if the weights are evenly distributed among many lags, this would show higher serial correlation.
The paper notes that because \theta_j \in [0, 1]
, \xi
is also
confined to the unit interval, and is minimized when all the
\theta_j
's are identical. That implies a value of 1/(k + 1)
for
\xi
, and a maximum value of \xi = 1
when one coefficient is 1
and the rest are 0. In the context of smoothed returns, a lower value of
\xi
implies more smoothing, and the upper bound of 1 implies no
smoothing.
The "smoothing index", represented as \xi
, is calculated the same way
the Herfindahl index. The Herfindal measure is well known in the industrial
organization literature as a measure of the concentration of firms in a
given industry where y_j
represents the market share of firm j
.
This method (as well as the implementation described in the paper), does not
enforce \theta_j \in [0, 1]
, so \xi
is not limited to that range
either. All we can say is that lower values are "less liquid" and higher
values are "more liquid" or mis-specified. In this function, setting the
parameter neg.thetas = FALSE does enforce the limitation, eliminating
negative autocorrelation coefficients from the calculation (the papers below
do not make an economic case for eliminating negative autocorrelation,
however).
Interpretation of the resulting value is difficult. All we can say is that lower values appear to have autocorrelation structure like we might expect of "less liquid" instruments. Higher values appear "more liquid" or are poorly fit or mis-specified.
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Dr. Stefan Albrecht, CFA, for invaluable input.
Author(s)
Peter Carl
References
Chan, Nicholas, Mila Getmansky, Shane M. Haas, and Andrew W. Lo. 2005. Systemic Risk and Hedge Funds. NBER Working Paper Series (11200). Getmansky, Mila, Andrew W. Lo, and Igor Makarov. 2004. An Econometric Model of Serial Correlation and Illiquidity in Hedge Fund Returns. Journal of Financial Economics (74): 529-609.
Examples
data(managers)
data(edhec)
SmoothingIndex(managers[,1,drop=FALSE])
SmoothingIndex(managers[,1:8])
SmoothingIndex(edhec)