FusionLearn-package {FusionLearn} | R Documentation |
Fusion Learning
Description
FusionLearn
package implements a new learning algorithm to integrate information from different experimental platforms. The algorithm applies the grouped penalization method in the pseudolikelihood setting.
Details
In the context of fusion learning, there are different data sets from
different experimental platforms. The data from each platform can be modeled by a different generalized linear model. Assume the same set of predictors
are measured across
different experimental platforms.
Platforms | Formula | | | | | | |
1 | | | | | | | |
2 | | | | | | | |
... | |||||||
k | | | | | | | |
Here represents the observation of the predictor
on the
th platform, and
denotes the vector of regression coefficients for the predictor
.
Platforms | | |
|
1 | | |
|
2 | | |
|
... | ... | ||
k | |
|
Consider the following examples.
Example 1. Suppose different types of experiments are conducted to study the genetic mechanism of a disease. The predictors in this research are different facets of individual genes, such as mRNA expression, protein expression, RNAseq expression and so on. The goal is to select the genes which affect the disease, while the genes are assessed in a number of ways through different measurement processes across
experimental platforms.
Example 2. The predictive models for three different financial indices are simultaneously built from a panel of stock index predictors. In this case, the predictor values across different models are the same, but the regression coefficients are different.
In the conventional approach, the model for each of the platforms is analyzed separately.
FusionLearn
algorithm selects significant predictors through learning from multiple models. The overall objective is to minimize the function:
with being the numbers of predictors,
being the penalty functions, and
denoting the
-norm of the coefficients of the predictor
.
The user can specify the penalty function and the penalty values
. This package also contains functions to provide the pseudolikelihood Bayesian information criterion:
with denoting the pseudo loglikelihood,
measuring the model complexity and
being the penalty on the model complexity.
The basic function fusionbase
deals with continuous responses. The function fusionbinary
is applied to binary responses, and the function fusionmixed
is applied to a mix of continuous and binary responses.
Note
Here we provide two examples to illustrate the data structures. Assume and
represent two sets of the predictors from 2 experimental platforms.
Example 1. If the observations from and
are independent, the number of observations can be different. The order of the predictors
in
matches with the predictors in
. If
does not include the predictor
, then the
in
needs to be filled with
NA
.
| | | | | | | |
||
| 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 20 |
| 100 | 8 | NA | 100 |
0.3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 7 | 30 | 1 | NA | 2 | ||
0.1 | 0.9 | 1 | 0 | 43 | 19 | NA | -3 | ||
-0.3 | 1.2 | 2 | 40 |
Example 2. If the observations from and
are correlated, the number of observations must be the same. The
th row in
is correlatd with the
th row in
. The predictors of
and
should be matched in order. The predictors which are not measured need to be filled with
NA
.
| | | | | | | |
||
| 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 20 |
| 0.3 | 0.8 | NA | 100 |
0.3 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 70 | 0.2 | 1 | NA | 20 | ||
-0.1 | 0.9 | 1 | 0 | 0.43 | 1.9 | NA | -30 | ||
-0.3 | 1.2 | 2 | 40 | -0.4 | -2 | NA | 40 |
In functions fusionbase.fit
, fusionbinary.fit
, and fusionmixed.fit
, the option depen
is used to specify whether observations from different platforms are correlated or independent.
Author(s)
Xin Gao, Yuan Zhong and Raymond J Carroll
Maintainer: Yuan Zhong <aqua.zhong@gmail.com>
References
Gao, X and Carroll, R. J. (2017) Data integration with high dimensionality. Biometrika, 104, 2, pp. 251-272