| elnormAlt {EnvStats} | R Documentation |
Estimate Parameters of a Lognormal Distribution (Original Scale)
Description
Estimate the mean and coefficient of variation of a lognormal distribution, and optionally construct a confidence interval for the mean.
Usage
elnormAlt(x, method = "mvue", ci = FALSE, ci.type = "two-sided",
ci.method = "land", conf.level = 0.95, parkin.list = NULL)
Arguments
x |
numeric vector of positive observations. |
method |
character string specifying the method of estimation. Possible values are
|
ci |
logical scalar indicating whether to compute a confidence interval for the
mean. The default value is |
ci.type |
character string indicating what kind of confidence interval to compute. The
possible values are |
ci.method |
character string indicating what method to use to construct the confidence interval
for the mean. The possible values are |
conf.level |
a scalar between 0 and 1 indicating the confidence level of the confidence interval.
The default value is |
parkin.list |
a list containing arguments for the function |
Details
If x contains any missing (NA), undefined (NaN) or
infinite (Inf, -Inf) values, they will be removed prior to
performing the estimation.
Let \underline{x} be a vector of n observations from a
lognormal distribution with
parameters mean=\theta and cv=\tau. Let \eta denote the
standard deviation of this distribution, so that \eta = \theta \tau. Set
\underline{y} = log(\underline{x}). Then \underline{y} is a vector of observations
from a normal distribution with parameters mean=\mu and sd=\sigma.
See the help file for LognormalAlt for the relationship between
\theta, \tau, \eta, \mu, and \sigma.
Estimation
This section explains how each of the estimators of mean=\theta and
cv=\tau are computed. The approach is to first compute estimates of
\theta and \eta^2 (the mean and variance of the lognormal distribution),
say \hat{\theta} and \hat{\eta}^2, then compute the estimate of the cv
\tau by \hat{\tau} = \hat{\eta}/\hat{\theta}.
Minimum Variance Unbiased Estimation (method="mvue")
The minimum variance unbiased estimators (mvue's) of \theta and \eta^2 were derived
by Finney (1941) and are discussed in Gilbert (1987, pp. 164-167) and Cohn et al. (1989). These
estimators are computed as:
\hat{\theta}_{mvue} = e^{\bar{y}} g_{n-1}(\frac{s^2}{2}) \;\;\;\; (1)
\hat{\eta}^2_{mvue} = e^{2 \bar{y}} \{g_{n-1}(2s^2) - g_{n-1}[\frac{(n-2)s^2}{n-1}]\} \;\;\;\; (2)
where
\bar{y} = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n y_i \;\;\;\; (3)
s^2 = \frac{1}{n-1} \sum_{i=1}^n (y_i - \bar{y})^2 \;\;\;\; (4)
g_m(z) = \sum_{i=0}^\infty \frac{m^i (m+2i)}{m(m+2) \cdots (m+2i)} (\frac{m}{m+1})^i (\frac{z^i}{i!}) \;\;\;\; (5)
The expected value and variance of the mvue of \theta are
(Bradu and Mundlak, 1970; Cohn et al., 1989):
E[\hat{\theta}_{mvue}] = \theta \;\;\;\; (6)
Var[\hat{\theta}_{mvue}] = e^{2\mu} \{e^{[(2+n-1)\sigma^2]/n} g_{n-1}(\frac{\sigma^4}{4n}) - e^{\sigma^2} \} \;\;\;\; (7)
Maximum Likelihood Estimation (method="mle")
The maximum likelihood estimators (mle's) of \theta and \eta^2 are given by:
\hat{\theta}_{mle} = exp(\bar{y} + \frac{\hat{\sigma}^2_{mle}}{2}) \;\;\;\; (8)
\hat{\eta}^2_{mle} = \hat{\theta}^2_{mle} \hat{\tau}^2_{mle} \;\;\;\; (9)
where
\hat{\tau}^2_{mle} = exp(\hat{\sigma}^2_{mle}) - 1 \;\;\;\; (10)
\hat{\sigma}^2_{mle} = \frac{n-1}{n} s^2 \;\;\;\; (11)
The expected value and variance of the mle of \theta are (after Cohn et al., 1989):
E[\hat{\theta}_{mle}] = \theta exp[\frac{-(n-1)\sigma^2}{2n}] (1 - \frac{\sigma^2}{n})^{-(n-1)/2} \;\;\;\; (12)
Var[\hat{\theta}_{mle}] = exp(2\mu + \frac{\sigma^2}{n}) \{exp(\frac{\sigma^2}{n}) [1 - \frac{2\sigma^2}{n}]^{-(n-1)/2} - [1 - \frac{\sigma^2}{n}]^{-(n-1)} \} \;\;\;\; (13)
As can be seen from equation (12), the expected value of the mle of \theta does not exist
when \sigma^2 > n. In general, the p'th moment of the mle of \theta does not
exist when \sigma^2 > n/p.
Quasi Maximum Likelihood Estimation (method="qmle")
The quasi maximum likelihood estimators (qmle's; Cohn et al., 1989; Gilbert, 1987, p.167) of
\theta and \eta^2 are the same as the mle's, except the mle of
\sigma^2 in equations (8) and (10) is replaced with the more commonly used
mvue of \sigma^2 shown in equation (4):
\hat{\theta}_{qmle} = exp(\bar{y} + \frac{s^2}{2}) \;\;\;\; (14)
\hat{\eta}^2_{qmle} = \hat{\theta}^2_{qmle} \hat{\tau}^2_{qmle} \;\;\;\; (15)
\hat{\tau}^2_{qmle} = exp(s^2) - 1 \;\;\;\; (16)
The expected value and variance of the qmle of \theta are (Cohn et al., 1989):
E[\hat{\theta}_{mle}] = \theta exp[\frac{-(n-1)\sigma^2}{2n}] (1 - \frac{\sigma^2}{n-1})^{-(n-1)/2} \;\;\;\; (17)
Var[\hat{\theta}_{mle}] = exp(2\mu + \frac{\sigma^2}{n}) \{exp(\frac{\sigma^2}{n}) [1 - \frac{2\sigma^2}{n-1}]^{-(n-1)/2} - [1 - \frac{\sigma^2}{n-1}]^{-(n-1)} \} \;\;\;\; (18)
As can be seen from equation (17), the expected value of the qmle of \theta does not exist
when \sigma^2 > (n - 1). In general, the p'th moment of the mle of \theta does
not exist when \sigma^2 > (n - 1)/p.
Note that Gilbert (1987, p. 167) incorrectly presents equation (12) rather than
equation (17) as the expected value of the qmle of \theta. For large values
of n relative to \sigma^2, however, equations (12) and (17) are
virtually identical.
Method of Moments Estimation (method="mme")
The method of moments estimators (mme's) of \theta and \eta^2 are found by equating
the sample mean and variance with their population values:
\hat{\theta}_{mme} = \bar{x} = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \;\;\;\; (19)
\hat{\eta}_{mme} = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \bar{x})^2 \;\;\;\; (20)
Note that the estimator of variance in equation (20) is biased.
The expected value and variance of the mme of \theta are:
E[\hat{\theta}_{mme}] = \theta \;\;\;\; (21)
Var[\hat{\theta}_{mme}] = \frac{\eta^2}{n} = \frac{1}{n} exp(2\mu + \sigma^2) [exp(\sigma^2)-1] \;\;\;\; (22)
Method of Moments Estimation Based on the Unbiased Estimate of Variance (method="mmue")
These estimators are exactly the same as the method of moments estimators described above, except
that the usual unbiased estimate of variance is used:
\hat{\theta}_{mmue} = \bar{x} = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \;\;\;\; (23)
\hat{\eta}_{mmue} = \frac{1}{n-1} \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \bar{x})^2 \;\;\;\; (24)
Since the mmue of \theta is equivalent to the mme of \theta, so are its mean and varaince.
Confidence Intervals
This section explains the different methods for constructing confidence intervals
for \theta, the mean of the lognormal distribution.
Land's Method (ci.method="land")
Land (1971, 1975) derived a method for computing one-sided (lower or upper)
uniformly most accurate unbiased confidence intervals for \theta. A
two-sided confidence interval can be constructed by combining an optimal lower
confidence limit with an optimal upper confidence limit. This procedure for
two-sided confidence intervals is only asymptotically optimal, but for most
purposes should be acceptable (Land, 1975, p.387).
As shown in equation (3) in the help file for LognormalAlt, the mean
\theta of a lognormal random variable is related to the mean \mu and
standard deviation \sigma of the log-transformed random variable by the
following relationship:
\theta = e^{\beta} \;\;\;\; (25)
where
\beta = \mu + \frac{\sigma^2}{2} \;\;\;\; (26)
Land (1971) developed confidence bounds for the quantity \beta. The mvue of
\beta is given by:
\hat{\beta}_{mvue} = \bar{y} + \frac{s^2}{2} \;\;\;\; (27)
Note that \hat{\theta}_{qmle} = exp(\hat{\beta}_{mvue}).
The (1-\alpha)100\% two-sided confidence interval for \beta is
given by:
[ \hat{\beta}_{mvue} + s \frac{C_{\alpha/2}}{\sqrt{n-1}}, \; \hat{\beta}_{mvue} + s \frac{C_{1-\alpha/2}}{\sqrt{n-1}} ] \;\;\;\; (28)
the (1-\alpha)100\% one-sided upper confidence interval for \beta is
given by:
[ -\infty, \; \hat{\beta}_{mvue} + s \frac{C_{1-\alpha}}{\sqrt{n-1}} ] \;\;\;\; (29)
and the (1-\alpha)100\% one-sided lower confidence interval for \beta is
given by:
[ \hat{\beta}_{mvue} + s \frac{C_{\alpha}}{\sqrt{n-1}}, \; \infty ] \;\;\;\; (30)
where s is the estimate of \sigma (see equation (4) above), and the
factor C is given in tables in Land (1975).
Thus, by equations (25)-(30), the two-sided (1-\alpha)100\% confidence
interval for \theta is given by:
\{\hat{\theta}_{qmle} exp[s \frac{C_{\alpha/2}}{\sqrt{n-1}}], \; \hat{\theta}_{qmle} exp[s \frac{C_{1-\alpha/2}}{\sqrt{n-1}}] \} \;\;\;\; (31)
the (1-\alpha)100\% one-sided upper confidence interval for \theta is
given by:
\{ 0, \; \hat{\theta}_{qmle} exp[s \frac{C_{1-\alpha}}{\sqrt{n-1}}] \} \;\;\;\; (32)
and the (1-\alpha)100\% one-sided lower confidence interval for \theta
is given by:
\{\hat{\theta}_{qmle} exp[s \frac{C_{\alpha}}{\sqrt{n-1}} ], \; \infty \} \;\;\;\; (33)
Note that Gilbert (1987, pp. 169-171, 264-265) denotes the quantity C above as
H and reproduces a subset of Land's (1975) tables. Some guidance documents
(e.g., USEPA, 1992d) refer to this quantity as the H-statistic.
Zou et al.'s Method (ci.method="zou")
Zou et al. (2009) proposed the following approximation for the two-sided
(1-\alpha)100\% confidence intervals for \theta. The lower limit LL
is given by:
LL = \hat{\theta}_{qmle} exp\{ -[\frac{z^2_{1-\alpha/2}s^2}{n} + (\frac{s^2}{2} - \frac{(n-1)s^2}{2\chi^2_{1-\alpha/2, n-1}})^2]^{1/2}\} \;\;\;\; (34)
and the upper limit UL is given by:
UL = \hat{\theta}_{qmle} exp\{ [\frac{z^2_{1-\alpha/2}s^2}{n} + (\frac{(n-1)s^2}{2\chi^2_{\alpha/2, n-1}} - \frac{s^2}{2})^2]^{1/2}\} \;\;\;\; (35)
where z_p denotes the p'th quantile of the standard
normal distribuiton, and \chi_{p, \nu} denotes the
p'th quantile of the chi-square distribution with
\nu degrees of freedom. The (1-\alpha)100\% one-sided lower confidence
limit and one-sided upper confidence limit are given by equations (34) and (35),
respectively, with \alpha/2 replaced by \alpha.
Parkin et al.'s Method (ci.method="parkin")
This method was developed by Parkin et al. (1990). It can be shown that the
mean of a lognormal distribution corresponds to the p'th quantile, where
p = \Phi(\frac{\sigma}{2}) \;\;\;\; (36)
and \Phi denotes the cumulative distribution function of the standard
normal distribution. Parkin et al. (1990) suggested
estimating p by replacing \sigma in equation (36) with the estimate
s as computed in equation (4). Once an estimate of p is obtained, a
nonparametric confidence interval can be constructed for p, assuming p
is equal to its estimated value (see eqnpar).
Cox's Method (ci.method="cox")
This method was suggested by Professor D.R. Cox and is illustrated in Land (1972).
El-Shaarawi (1989) adapts this method to the case of censored water quality data.
Cox's idea is to construct an approximate (1-\alpha)100\% confidence interval
for the quantity \beta defined in equation (26) above assuming the estimate of
\beta is approximately normally distributed, and then exponentiate the
confidence limits. That is, a two-sided (1-\alpha)100\% confidence interval
for \theta is constructed as:
[exp(\hat{\beta} - t_{1-\alpha/2, n-1}\hat{\sigma}_{\hat{\beta}}), \; exp(\hat{\beta} + t_{1-\alpha/2, n-1}\hat{\sigma}_{\hat{\beta}})] \;\;\;\; (37)
where t(p, \nu) denotes the p'th quantile of
Student's t-distribution with \nu degrees of freedom.
Note that this method, unlike the normal approximation method discussed below,
guarantees a positive value for the lower confidence limit. One-sided confidence
intervals are computed in a similar fashion.
Define an estimator of \beta by:
\hat{\beta} = \hat{\mu} + \frac{\hat{\sigma}^2}{2} \;\;\;\; (38)
Then the variance of this estimator is given by:
Var(\hat{\beta}) = Var(\hat{\mu}) + Cov(\hat{\mu}, \hat{\sigma}^2) + \frac{1}{4}Var(\hat{\sigma}^2) \;\;\;\; (39)
The function elnormAlt follows Land (1972) and uses the minimum variance
unbiased estimator for \beta shown in equation (27) above, so the variance and
estimated variance of this estimator are:
Var(\hat{\beta}_{mvue}) = \frac{\sigma^2}{n} + \frac{\sigma^4}{2(n-1)} \;\;\;\; (40)
\hat{\sigma}^2_{\hat{\beta}} = \frac{s^2}{n} + \frac{s^4}{2(n+1)} \;\;\;\; (41)
Note that El-Shaarawi (1989, equation 5) simply replaces the value of s^2 in
equation (41) with some estimator of \sigma^2 (the mle or mvue of
\sigma^2), rather than using the mvue of the variance of \beta as shown
in equation (41).
Normal Approximation (ci.method="normal.approx")
This method constructs approximate (1-\alpha)100\% confidence intervals for
\theta based on the assumption that the estimator of \theta is
approximately normally distributed. That is, a two-sided (1-\alpha)100\%
confidence interval for \theta is constructed as:
[\hat{\theta} - t_{1-\alpha/2, n-1}\hat{\sigma}_{\hat{\theta}}, \; \hat{\theta} + t_{1-\alpha/2, n-1}\hat{\sigma}_{\hat{\theta}}] \;\;\;\; (42)
One-sided confidence intervals are computed in a similar fashion.
When method="mvue" is used to estimate \theta, an unbiased estimate of
the variance of the estimator of \theta is used in equation (42)
(Bradu and Mundlak, 1970, equation 4.3; Gilbert, 1987, equation 13.5):
\hat{\sigma^2}_{\hat{\theta}} = e^{2\bar{y}} \{[g_{n-1}(\frac{s^2}{2})]^2 - g_{n-1}[\frac{s^2(n-2)}{n-1}] \} \;\;\;\; (43)
When method="mle" is used to estimate \theta, the estimate of the
variance of the estimator of \theta is computed by replacing \mu and
\sigma^2 in equation (13) with their mle's:
\hat{\sigma}^2_{\hat{\theta}} = exp(2\bar{y} + \frac{\hat{\sigma}^2_{mle}}{n}) \{exp(\frac{\hat{\sigma}^2_{mle}}{n}) [1 - \frac{2\hat{\sigma}^2_{mle}}{n}]^{-(n-1)/2} - [1 - \frac{\hat{\sigma}^2_{mle}}{n}]^{-(n-1)} \} \;\;\;\; (44)
When method="qmle" is used to estimate \theta, the estimate of the
variance of the estimator of \theta is computed by replacing \mu and
\sigma^2 in equation (18) with their mvue's:
\hat{\sigma}^2_{\hat{\theta}} = exp(2\bar{y} + \frac{s^2}{n}) \{exp(\frac{s^2}{n}) [1 - \frac{2 s^2}{n-1}]^{-(n-1)/2} - [1 - \frac{s^2}{n-1}]^{-(n-1)} \} \;\;\;\; (45)
Note that equation (45) is exactly the same as Gilbert's (1987, p. 167) equation
13.8a, except that Gilbert (1987) erroneously uses n where he should use
n-1 instead. For large values of n relative to s^2, however,
this makes little difference.
When method="mme", the estimate of the variance of the estimator of
\theta is computed by replacing eta^2 in equation (22) with the
mme of \eta^2 defined in equation (20):
\hat{\sigma}^2_{\hat{\theta}} = \frac{\hat{\eta}_{mme}^2}{n} = \frac{1}{n^2} \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \bar{x})^2 \;\;\;\; (46)
When method="mmue", the estimate of the variance of the estimator of
\theta is computed by replacing eta^2 in equation (22) with the
mmue of \eta^2 defined in equation (24):
\hat{\sigma}^2_{\hat{\theta}} = \frac{\hat{\eta}_{mmue}^2}{n} = \frac{1}{n(n-1)} \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \bar{x})^2 \;\;\;\; (47)
Value
a list of class "estimate" containing the estimated parameters and other information.
See
estimate.object for details.
Note
The normal and lognormal distribution are probably the two most frequently used distributions to model environmental data. In order to make any kind of probability statement about a normally-distributed population (of chemical concentrations for example), you have to first estimate the mean and standard deviation (the population parameters) of the distribution. Once you estimate these parameters, it is often useful to characterize the uncertainty in the estimate of the mean or variance. This is done with confidence intervals.
Some EPA guidance documents (e.g., Singh et al., 2002; Singh et al., 2010a,b) strongly recommend against using a lognormal model for environmental data and recommend trying a gamma distribuiton instead.
USEPA (1992d) directs persons involved in risk assessment for Superfund sites to
use Land's (1971, 1975) method (ci.method="land") for computing the upper
95% confidence interval for the mean, assuming the data follow a lognormal
distribution (the guidance document cites Gilbert (1987) as a source of descriptions
and tables for this method). The last example in the EXAMPLES section below
reproduces an example from this guidance document.
In the past, some authors suggested using the geometric mean, also called the
"rating curve" estimator (Cohn et al., 1989), as the estimator of the mean,
\theta. This estimator is computed as:
\hat{\theta}_{rc} = e^{\bar{y}} \;\;\;\; (48)
Cohn et al. (1989) cite several authors who have pointed out this estimator is
biased and is not even a consistent estimator of the mean. In fact, it is the
maximum likelihood estimator of the median of the distribution
(see eqlnorm.)
Finney (1941) computed the efficiency of the method of moments estimators of the
mean (\theta) and variance (\eta^2) of the lognormal distribution
(equations (19)-(20)) relative to the mvue's (equations (1)-(2)) as a function of
\sigma^2 (the variance of the log-transformed observations), and found that
while the mme of \theta is reasonably efficient compared to the mvue of
\theta, the mme of \eta^2 performs quite poorly relative to the
mvue of \eta^2.
Cohn et al. (1989) and Parkin et al. (1988) have shown that the qmle and the mle of the mean can be severely biased for typical environmental data, and suggest always using the mvue.
Parkin et al. (1990) studied the performance of various methods for constructing a
confidence interval for the mean via Monte Carlo simulation. They compared
approximate methods to Land's optimal method (ci.method="land"). They used
four parent lognormal distributions to generate observations; all had mean 10, but
differed in coefficient of variation: 50, 100, 200, and 500%. They also generated
sample sizes from 6 to 100 in increments of 2. For each combination of parent
distribution and sample size, they generated 25,000 Monte Carlo trials.
Parkin et al. found that for small sample sizes (n < 20), none of the
approximate methods ("parkin", "cox", "normal.approx") worked
very well. For n > 20, their method ("parkin") provided reasonably
accurate coverage. Cox's method ("cox") worked well for n > 60, and
performed slightly better than Parkin et al.'s method ("parkin") for highly
skewed populations.
Zou et al. (2009) used Monte Carlo simulation to compare the performance of their method with the CGI method of Krishnamoorthy and Mathew (2003) and the modified Cox method of Armstrong (1992) and El-Shaarawi and Lin (2007). Performance was assessed based on 1) percentage of times the interval contained the parameter value (coverage%), 2) balance between left and right tail errors, and 3) confidence interval width. All three methods showed acceptable coverage percentages. The modified Cox method showed unbalanced tail errors, and Zou et al.'s method showed consistently narrower average width.
Author(s)
Steven P. Millard (EnvStats@ProbStatInfo.com)
References
Aitchison, J., and J.A.C. Brown (1957). The Lognormal Distribution (with special references to its uses in economics). Cambridge University Press, London, Chapter 5.
Armstrong, B.G. (1992). Confidence Intervals for Arithmetic Means of Lognormally Distributed Exposures. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 53, 481–485.
Bradu, D., and Y. Mundlak. (1970). Estimation in Lognormal Linear Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 65, 198–211.
Cohn, T.A., L.L. DeLong, E.J. Gilroy, R.M. Hirsch, and D.K. Wells. (1989). Estimating Constituent Loads. Water Resources Research 25(5), 937–942.
Crow, E.L., and K. Shimizu. (1988). Lognormal Distributions: Theory and Applications. Marcel Dekker, New York, Chapter 2.
El-Shaarawi, A.H., and J. Lin. (2007). Interval Estimation for Log-Normal Mean with Applications to Water Quality. Environmetrics 18, 1–10.
El-Shaarawi, A.H., and R. Viveros. (1997). Inference About the Mean in Log-Regression with Environmental Applications. Environmetrics 8, 569–582.
Forbes, C., M. Evans, N. Hastings, and B. Peacock. (2011). Statistical Distributions. Fourth Edition. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
Finney, D.J. (1941). On the Distribution of a Variate Whose Logarithm is Normally Distributed. Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 7, 155–161.
Gilbert, R.O. (1987). Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, NY.
Johnson, N. L., S. Kotz, and N. Balakrishnan. (1994). Continuous Univariate Distributions, Volume 1. Second Edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Krishnamoorthy, K., and T.P. Mathew. (2003). Inferences on the Means of Lognormal Distributions Using Generalized p-Values and Generalized Confidence Intervals. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 115, 103–121.
Land, C.E. (1971). Confidence Intervals for Linear Functions of the Normal Mean and Variance. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 42(4), 1187–1205.
Land, C.E. (1972). An Evaluation of Approximate Confidence Interval Estimation Methods for Lognormal Means. Technometrics 14(1), 145–158.
Land, C.E. (1973). Standard Confidence Limits for Linear Functions of the Normal Mean and Variance. Journal of the American Statistical Association 68(344), 960–963.
Land, C.E. (1975). Tables of Confidence Limits for Linear Functions of the Normal Mean and Variance, in Selected Tables in Mathematical Statistics, Vol. III. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, pp. 385–419.
Likes, J. (1980). Variance of the MVUE for Lognormal Variance. Technometrics 22(2), 253–258.
Limpert, E., W.A. Stahel, and M. Abbt. (2001). Log-Normal Distributions Across the Sciences: Keys and Clues. BioScience 51, 341–352.
Millard, S.P., and N.K. Neerchal. (2001). Environmental Statistics with S-PLUS. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
Ott, W.R. (1995). Environmental Statistics and Data Analysis. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL.
Parkin, T.B., J.J. Meisinger, S.T. Chester, J.L. Starr, and J.A. Robinson. (1988). Evaluation of Statistical Estimation Methods for Lognormally Distributed Variables. Journal of the Soil Science Society of America 52, 323–329.
Parkin, T.B., S.T. Chester, and J.A. Robinson. (1990). Calculating Confidence Intervals for the Mean of a Lognormally Distributed Variable. Journal of the Soil Science Society of America 54, 321–326.
Singh, A., A.K. Singh, and R.J. Iaci. (2002). Estimation of the Exposure Point Concentration Term Using a Gamma Distribution. EPA/600/R-02/084. October 2002. Technology Support Center for Monitoring and Site Characterization, Office of Research and Development, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
Singh, A., R. Maichle, and N. Armbya. (2010a). ProUCL Version 4.1.00 User Guide (Draft). EPA/600/R-07/041, May 2010. Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
Singh, A., N. Armbya, and A. Singh. (2010b). ProUCL Version 4.1.00 Technical Guide (Draft). EPA/600/R-07/041, May 2010. Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
USEPA. (1992d). Supplemental Guidance to RAGS: Calculating the Concentration Term. Publication 9285.7-081, May 1992. Intermittenet Bulletin, Volume 1, Number 1. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Hazardous Site Evaluation Division, OS-230. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
USEPA. (2009). Statistical Analysis of Groundwater Monitoring Data at RCRA Facilities, Unified Guidance. EPA 530/R-09-007, March 2009. Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery Program Implementation and Information Division. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
Zou, G.Y., C.Y. Huo, and J. Taleban. (2009). Simple Confidence Intervals for Lognormal Means and their Differences with Environmental Applications. Environmetrics 20, 172–180.
See Also
LognormalAlt, Lognormal, Normal.
Examples
# Using the Reference area TcCB data in the data frame EPA.94b.tccb.df,
# estimate the mean and coefficient of variation,
# and construct a 95% confidence interval for the mean.
with(EPA.94b.tccb.df, elnormAlt(TcCB[Area == "Reference"], ci = TRUE))
#Results of Distribution Parameter Estimation
#--------------------------------------------
#
#Assumed Distribution: Lognormal
#
#Estimated Parameter(s): mean = 0.5989072
# cv = 0.4899539
#
#Estimation Method: mvue
#
#Data: TcCB[Area == "Reference"]
#
#Sample Size: 47
#
#Confidence Interval for: mean
#
#Confidence Interval Method: Land
#
#Confidence Interval Type: two-sided
#
#Confidence Level: 95%
#
#Confidence Interval: LCL = 0.5243787
# UCL = 0.7016992
#----------
# Compare the different methods of estimating the distribution parameters using the
# Reference area TcCB data.
with(EPA.94b.tccb.df, elnormAlt(TcCB[Area == "Reference"], method = "mvue"))$parameters
# mean cv
#0.5989072 0.4899539
with(EPA.94b.tccb.df, elnormAlt(TcCB[Area == "Reference"], method = "qmle"))$parameters
# mean cv
#0.6004468 0.4947791
with(EPA.94b.tccb.df, elnormAlt(TcCB[Area == "Reference"], method = "mle"))$parameters
# mean cv
#0.5990497 0.4888968
with(EPA.94b.tccb.df, elnormAlt(TcCB[Area == "Reference"], method = "mme"))$parameters
# mean cv
#0.5985106 0.4688423
with(EPA.94b.tccb.df, elnormAlt(TcCB[Area == "Reference"], method = "mmue"))$parameters
# mean cv
#0.5985106 0.4739110
#----------
# Compare the different methods of constructing the confidence interval for
# the mean using the Reference area TcCB data.
with(EPA.94b.tccb.df, elnormAlt(TcCB[Area == "Reference"],
method = "mvue", ci = TRUE, ci.method = "land"))$interval$limits
# LCL UCL
#0.5243787 0.7016992
with(EPA.94b.tccb.df, elnormAlt(TcCB[Area == "Reference"],
method = "mvue", ci = TRUE, ci.method = "zou"))$interval$limits
# LCL UCL
#0.5230444 0.6962071
with(EPA.94b.tccb.df, elnormAlt(TcCB[Area == "Reference"],
method = "mvue", ci = TRUE, ci.method = "parkin"))$interval$limits
# LCL UCL
#0.50 0.74
with(EPA.94b.tccb.df, elnormAlt(TcCB[Area == "Reference"],
method = "mvue", ci = TRUE, ci.method = "cox"))$interval$limits
# LCL UCL
#0.5196213 0.6938444
with(EPA.94b.tccb.df, elnormAlt(TcCB[Area == "Reference"],
method = "mvue", ci = TRUE, ci.method = "normal.approx"))$interval$limits
# LCL UCL
#0.5130160 0.6847984
#----------
# Reproduce the example in Highlights 7 and 8 of USEPA (1992d). This example shows
# how to compute the upper 95% confidence limit of the mean of a lognormal distribution
# and compares it to the result of computing the upper 95% confidence limit assuming a
# normal distribution. The data for this example are chromium concentrations (mg/kg) in
# soil samples collected randomly over a Superfund site, and are stored in the data frame
# EPA.92d.chromium.vec.
# First look at the data
EPA.92d.chromium.vec
# [1] 10 13 20 36 41 59 67 110 110 136 140 160 200 230 1300
stripChart(EPA.92d.chromium.vec, ylab = "Chromium (mg/kg)")
# Note there is one very large "outlier" (1300).
# Perform a goodness-of-fit test to determine whether a lognormal distribution
# is appropriate:
gof.list <- gofTest(EPA.92d.chromium.vec, dist = 'lnormAlt')
gof.list
#Results of Goodness-of-Fit Test
#-------------------------------
#
#Test Method: Shapiro-Wilk GOF
#
#Hypothesized Distribution: Lognormal
#
#Estimated Parameter(s): mean = 159.855185
# cv = 1.493994
#
#Estimation Method: mvue
#
#Data: EPA.92d.chromium.vec
#
#Sample Size: 15
#
#Test Statistic: W = 0.9607179
#
#Test Statistic Parameter: n = 15
#
#P-value: 0.7048747
#
#Alternative Hypothesis: True cdf does not equal the
# Lognormal Distribution.
plot(gof.list, digits = 2)
# The lognormal distribution seems to provide an adequate fit, although the largest
# observation (1300) is somewhat suspect, and given the small sample size there is
# not much power to detect any kind of mild deviation from a lognormal distribution.
# Now compute the one-sided 95% upper confidence limit for the mean.
# Note that the value of 502 mg/kg shown in Hightlight 7 of USEPA (1992d) is a bit
# larger than the exact value of 496.6 mg/kg shown below.
# This is simply due to rounding error.
elnormAlt(EPA.92d.chromium.vec, ci = TRUE, ci.type = "upper")
#Results of Distribution Parameter Estimation
#--------------------------------------------
#
#Assumed Distribution: Lognormal
#
#Estimated Parameter(s): mean = 159.855185
# cv = 1.493994
#
#Estimation Method: mvue
#
#Data: EPA.92d.chromium.vec
#
#Sample Size: 15
#
#Confidence Interval for: mean
#
#Confidence Interval Method: Land
#
#Confidence Interval Type: upper
#
#Confidence Level: 95%
#
#Confidence Interval: LCL = 0
# UCL = 496.6282
# Now compare this result with the upper 95% confidence limit based on assuming
# a normal distribution. Again note that the value of 325 mg/kg shown in
# Hightlight 8 is slightly larger than the exact value of 320.3 mg/kg shown below.
# This is simply due to rounding error.
enorm(EPA.92d.chromium.vec, ci = TRUE, ci.type = "upper")
#Results of Distribution Parameter Estimation
#--------------------------------------------
#
#Assumed Distribution: Normal
#
#Estimated Parameter(s): mean = 175.4667
# sd = 318.5440
#
#Estimation Method: mvue
#
#Data: EPA.92d.chromium.vec
#
#Sample Size: 15
#
#Confidence Interval for: mean
#
#Confidence Interval Method: Exact
#
#Confidence Interval Type: upper
#
#Confidence Level: 95%
#
#Confidence Interval: LCL = -Inf
# UCL = 320.3304
#----------
# Clean up
#---------
rm(gof.list)