drdid_imp_panel {DRDID} | R Documentation |
Improved locally efficient doubly robust DiD estimator for the ATT, with panel data
Description
drdid_imp_panel
is used to compute the locally efficient doubly robust estimators for the ATT
in difference-in-differences (DiD) setups with panel data. The resulting estimator is also doubly robust
for inference; see Section 3.1 of Sant'Anna and Zhao (2020).
Usage
drdid_imp_panel(
y1,
y0,
D,
covariates,
i.weights = NULL,
boot = FALSE,
boot.type = "weighted",
nboot = NULL,
inffunc = FALSE
)
Arguments
y1 |
An |
y0 |
An |
D |
An |
covariates |
An |
i.weights |
An |
boot |
Logical argument to whether bootstrap should be used for inference. Default is FALSE. |
boot.type |
Type of bootstrap to be performed (not relevant if |
nboot |
Number of bootstrap repetitions (not relevant if |
inffunc |
Logical argument to whether influence function should be returned. Default is FALSE. |
Details
The drdid_imp_panel
function implements the locally efficient doubly robust difference-in-differences (DiD)
estimator for the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) defined in equation (3.1)
in Sant'Anna and Zhao (2020). This estimator makes use of a logistic propensity score model for the probability
of being in the treated group, and of a linear regression model for the outcome evolution among the comparison units.
The nuisance parameters (propensity score and outcome regression parameters) are estimated using the methods described in Sections 3.1 of Sant'Anna and Zhao (2020). In short, the propensity score parameters are estimated using the inverse probability tilting estimator proposed by Graham, Pinto and Pinto (2012), and the outcome regression coefficients are estimated using weighted least squares,where the weights depend on the propensity score estimates; see Sant'Anna and Zhao (2020) for details.
The resulting estimator is not only locally efficient and doubly robust for the ATT, but it is also doubly robust for inference; see Sant'Anna and Zhao (2020) for details.
Value
A list containing the following components:
ATT |
The DiD point estimate. |
se |
The DiD standard error. |
uci |
The upper bound of the 95% CI for the ATT. |
lci |
The lower bound of the 95% CI for the ATT |
boots |
All Bootstrap draws of the ATT, in case bootstrap was used to conduct inference. Default is |
ps.flag |
Convergence Flag for the propensity score estimation: =0 if |
att.inf.func |
Estimate of the influence function. Default is NULL |
call.param |
The matched call. |
argu |
Some arguments used (explicitly or not) in the call (panel = TRUE, estMethod = "imp", boot, boot.type, nboot, type="dr") |
References
Graham, Bryan, Pinto, Cristine, and Egel, Daniel (2012), "Inverse Probability Tilting for Moment Condition Models with Missing Data." Review of Economic Studies, vol. 79 (3), pp. 1053-1079, doi:10.1093/restud/rdr047
Sant'Anna, Pedro H. C. and Zhao, Jun. (2020), "Doubly Robust Difference-in-Differences Estimators." Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 219 (1), pp. 101-122, doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.06.003
Examples
# Form the Lalonde sample with CPS comparison group
eval_lalonde_cps <- subset(nsw, nsw$treated == 0 | nsw$sample == 2)
# Further reduce sample to speed example
set.seed(123)
unit_random <- sample(1:nrow(eval_lalonde_cps), 5000)
eval_lalonde_cps <- eval_lalonde_cps[unit_random,]
# Select some covariates
covX = as.matrix(cbind(eval_lalonde_cps$age, eval_lalonde_cps$educ,
eval_lalonde_cps$black, eval_lalonde_cps$married,
eval_lalonde_cps$nodegree, eval_lalonde_cps$hisp,
eval_lalonde_cps$re74))
# Implement improved DR locally efficient DiD with panel data
drdid_imp_panel(y1 = eval_lalonde_cps$re78, y0 = eval_lalonde_cps$re75,
D = eval_lalonde_cps$experimental,
covariates = covX)